STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor
Outcome
Appeal allowedI allowed the appeal.
Source: [2024] SGHC 137, High Court (General Division), decided 24 May 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Wong Li Kok, Alex |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, GH LLC, Tito Isaac & Co LLP, Chong Yi Mei (Zhang Yimei), Hsu Bi-Wei, Isaac Tito Shane, Jawharilal Balachandran, Julia Emma Cruz, Li Shunhui Daniel, Tay Eu-Yen, Timothy Homer, Wong Hin Pkin Wendell, Yeo Cai Yun Kimberly |
Source: [2024] SGHC 137, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (13)
Case Significance
Star Engineering Pte Ltd v Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHC 137 was decided by the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 24 May 2024 in Originating Application No 1135 of 2023 (Registrar's Appeal No 4 of 2024), with Wong Li Kok, Alex JC delivering the grounds of decision after a hearing on 20 February 2024. The matter was the first respondent's appeal against the assistant registrar's decision in HC/SUM 3431/2023 dismissing its application for a stay of HC/OA 1135/2023 on the basis that the parties had agreed to submit their disputes to arbitration. The applicant Star Engineering Pte Ltd and the first respondent Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd are Singapore-incorporated building construction companies; on or around 25 September 2019 Pollisum engaged Star as its contractor for the design, construction and maintenance of works for a project. The court ruled in favour of keeping the parties to their promise to arbitrate, addressing the court's discretion under the Arbitration Act and the question of a case management stay.
[2024] SGHC 137 explained
STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGHC 137) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 24 May 2024. It is categorised under Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 137 about?
STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGHC 137) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings — Case management stay” and “Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings — Court’s discretion under Arbitration Act”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 137 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 137 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 72. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2024] SGHC 137?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 137 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Star Engineering Pte Ltd and Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd, both Singapore construction companies, were in dispute over a building project, with Great Eastern General Insurance Limited involved as the party that issued an on-demand performance bond. The matter concerned Pollisum's appeal against an assistant registrar's refusal to stay the court proceedings in favour of arbitration, raising the tension between an arbitration agreement and the court's discretion under the Arbitration Act. The court allowed a stay of the proceedings between the applicant and Pollisum and granted a case management stay as between the applicant and the insurer, finding no exceptional circumstances or sufficient reason to deny effect to the arbitration agreement.
What was Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering [2024] SGHC 137 about?
Decided on 24 May 2024 by Wong Li Kok, Alex JC, the case was an appeal over whether court proceedings in HC/OA 1135/2023 should be stayed in favour of arbitration. The court ruled in favour of holding the parties to their agreement to arbitrate their construction dispute.
Who were the parties in Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering [2024] SGHC 137?
The applicant was Star Engineering Pte Ltd, represented by Drew & Napier LLC. The first respondent was Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd, represented by Tito Isaac & Co LLP, and the second respondent was Great Eastern General Insurance Limited, represented by GH LLC.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (8)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 137)