DXX v DXY

[2026] SGHC 210 High Court (General Division) 9 October 2026 HC/OA 624/2026 40 min read
6 cases cited

Featured in the weekly digest — week of 5–11 October 2026 →

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Aidan Xu
Charges / claim Arbitration
Counsel Trident Law Corporation, Wong Thai Yong LLC, Mohamed Hashim H Sirajudeen, Suhaimi bin Lazim, Wong Thai Yong

Source: [2026] SGHC 210, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

DXX Applicant
DXY Respondent

Case Significance

DXX v DXY [2026] SGHC 210 was decided by Aidan Xu J in the General Division of the High Court (Originating Application No 624 of 2026) on 9 October 2026, after a hearing on 14 August 2026. DXX, a firm incorporated in Hong Kong, applied to set aside a Final Merits Award dated 2 April 2026 made by a sole arbitrator in a Singapore-seated SIAC arbitration in favour of DXY, who had claimed SPAC-related commissions under a Partnership Agreement dated 8 May 2018 and a 4 February 2021 email. DXX also counterclaimed in defamation over a message sent on 7 March 2023. The issues were breach of natural justice under s 24(b) of the IAA, excess of jurisdiction and breach of agreed procedure under Article 34(2)(a)(iii) and (iv) of the Model Law. The court dismissed all five grounds and the Award stands.

[2026] SGHC 210 explained

DXX v DXY ([2026] SGHC 210) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 9 October 2026. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC 210 about?

DXX v DXY ([2026] SGHC 210) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 210 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), Defamation Act, and International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 210 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2026] SGCA(I) 4. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

The General Division of the High Court heard an application by DXX, an international investment banking and financial advisory firm incorporated in Hong Kong, to set aside a SIAC arbitration award made in favour of DXY, who had claimed SPAC-related commissions under a Partnership Agreement dated 8 May 2018. DXX raised five grounds, including breach of natural justice under s 24(b) of the International Arbitration Act and excess of jurisdiction under Article 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Model Law. The court dismissed all five grounds and held that the Award stands in its entirety.

What was DXX v DXY [2026] SGHC 210 about?

DXX applied to set aside a SIAC arbitration award in favour of DXY, who had claimed SPAC-related commissions under a Partnership Agreement dated 8 May 2018. DXX relied on natural justice, excess of jurisdiction and agreed procedure grounds.

What did the court decide in [2026] SGHC 210?

Aidan Xu J dismissed all five grounds of challenge. DXX established no breach of natural justice under s 24(b) of the IAA, no excess of jurisdiction and no breach of agreed procedure under Article 34(2)(a) of the Model Law. The Award stands in its entirety.

Statutes Cited

Defamation Act
s 9

Cases Cited (6)

SLR (5)
[2012] 4 SLR 98 [2021] 2 SLR 235 [2022] 1 SLR 1080 [2025] 1 SLR 526 [2025] 1 SLR 806

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 210)