HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL
Key facts
| Court | Court of Appeal |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Andrew Phang Boon Leong, Judith Prakash, Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Netto & Magin LLC, Shook Lin & Bok LLP, Tan Kok Quan Partnership, Tan Rajah & Cheah, Chan Ming Onn David, Chelva Retnam Rajah, Chin Li Yuen Marina, Eusuff Ali s/o N B M Mohamed Kassim, Fong Zhiwei Daryl, Joseph Tay Weiwen, Lee Yen Yin, Lin Ruizi, Mohamed Shafie Bin Allameen, Netto Leslie, Netto Leslie née Lucy Michael, Roqiyah Begum d/o Mohd Aslam, Samantha Tan Sin Ying, Teo Jin Yun Germaine |
Source: [2023] SGCA 42, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (5)
Counsel (18)
Parties (10)
Case Significance
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL [2023] SGCA 42, reported as How Weng Fan and others v Sengkang Town Council and other appeals, is a Court of Appeal judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ on 29 November 2023, with Andrew Phang Boon Leong, Judith Prakash, Tay Yong Kwang and Woo Bih Li on the coram. It addresses the principles governing costs across Civil Appeals Nos 196 to 200 of 2019, arising from Suit Nos 668 and 716 of 2017 brought by Aljunied-Hougang Town Council and Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council. The appellants included Sylvia Lim Swee Lian, Low Thia Khiang, Pritam Singh, Chua Zhi Hon, Kenneth Foo Seck Guan, How Weng Fan and FM Solutions & Services Pte Ltd. The judgment cites 16 Singapore authorities.
[2023] SGCA 42 explained
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL ([2023] SGCA 42) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 29 November 2023. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGCA 42 about?
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL ([2023] SGCA 42) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Costs — Principles”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGCA 42 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGCA(I) 8. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What was How Weng Fan v Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council [2023] SGCA 42 about?
It was a Court of Appeal judgment on the principles governing costs across Civil Appeals Nos 196 to 200 of 2019, following the town council suits. Sundaresh Menon CJ delivered it on 29 November 2023 in the Sengkang and Aljunied-Hougang Town Council appeals.
Which judges decided How Weng Fan [2023] SGCA 42?
The five-judge Court of Appeal comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong, Judith Prakash, Tay Yong Kwang and Woo Bih Li, with Sundaresh Menon CJ delivering the costs judgment on 29 November 2023.
Cases Cited (16)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGCA 42)