PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CEJ
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | See Kee Oon |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Ang Siok Chen, Gail Wong, Lim Ying Min |
Source: [2023] SGHC 169, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Public Prosecutor v CEJ [2023] SGHC 169 is a grounds of decision of See Kee Oon J in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 16 June 2023 in Criminal Case No 11 of 2022. The accused was convicted on 4 May 2023 after pleading guilty to six proceeded charges out of 17: five counts of abetment by conspiracy to commit rape under s 375(1)(a) punishable under s 375(2) read with s 109 of the Penal Code, and one count of sexual assault by digital-vaginal penetration under s 376(2)(a) punishable under s 376(3). A further 11 charges, including counts of administering a poison under s 328 and outrage of modesty under s 354(1), were taken into consideration; the judge sentenced the accused to an aggregate 29 years' imprisonment and caning subject to the statutory maximum of 24 strokes.
[2023] SGHC 169 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CEJ ([2023] SGHC 169) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 16 June 2023. It is categorised under Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC 169 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CEJ ([2023] SGHC 169) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Abetment”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Rape”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Sexual offences”, and “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC 169 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2023] SGHC 169?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC 169 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
The accused pleaded guilty to six charges, including five counts of abetment by conspiracy to commit rape and one count of sexual assault by penetration under the Penal Code, arising from a scheme in which husbands arranged for their sedated wives to be raped. Eleven further charges were taken into consideration. The High Court sentenced the accused to an aggregate 29 years' imprisonment and caning subject to the statutory maximum of 24 strokes.
What was Public Prosecutor v CEJ [2023] SGHC 169 about?
It was a grounds of decision of See Kee Oon J, delivered on 16 June 2023, after the accused pleaded guilty on 4 May 2023 to six charges, including five counts of abetment by conspiracy to commit rape and one count of sexual assault by penetration.
What sentence was imposed in [2023] SGHC 169?
The court sentenced the accused to an aggregate imprisonment term of 29 years and to caning subject to the maximum of 24 strokes permitted by law, with 11 further charges taken into consideration for the purpose of sentencing.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 169)