AXIS MEGALINK SDN BHD v FAR EAST MINING PTE LTD

[2023] SGHC 243 High Court (General Division) 31 August 2023 HC/S 342/2021
20 cases cited (17 SG, 3 foreign) Cited by 4 cases

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Goh Yihan
Charges / claim Tort, Contract, Agency
Counsel David Lim & Partners LLP, Luo Ling Ling LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Chng Zi Zhao Joel, Daniel Yeap Zhu Chuean, Felicia Soong Wanyi, G Kiran, Joshua Ho Jin Le, Koh Swee Yen, Koong Len Sheng, Luo Ling Ling, Noor Heeqmah binte Wahianuar, Sharifah Nabilah Binte Syed Omar

Source: [2023] SGHC 243, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (13)

Parties (5)

Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Far East Mining Pte Ltd Defendant
Chong Wan Ling Defendant In Counterclaim
Lee Kien Han Defendant In Counterclaim
Lim Eng Hoe Defendant In Counterclaim

Case Significance

Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd v Far East Mining Pte Ltd [2023] SGHC 243 is a reserved judgment of Goh Yihan JC in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 31 August 2023 in Suit No 342 of 2021. The plaintiff, Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd, a Malaysia-incorporated company, sued Far East Mining Pte Ltd, a Singapore asset management company, over an engagement letter dated 16 August 2016 under which Axis was engaged as introducer and arranger for a proposed reverse takeover of China Bearing (Singapore) Limited (later renamed Silkroad Nickel Ltd). Axis claimed the arranger fee of US$2m, and the judgment addresses claims spanning the tort of conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, unilateral mistake as to the identity of a contracting counterparty, and the attribution of an agent's knowledge of his own breach to his principal.

Summary

Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian company, sued Far East Mining Pte Ltd for a US$2m arranger fee under an engagement letter for a proposed reverse takeover, while FEM counterclaimed on grounds it did not know Mr Lee Kien Han was Axis's beneficial owner. The court dismissed Axis's claim and found for FEM on its misrepresentation counterclaim against Mr Lee and Axis, awarding S$10,210 in damages, so that FEM was not bound to the engagement letter or liable for the fee.

What was Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd v Far East Mining Pte Ltd [2023] SGHC 243 about?

It was a dispute before Goh Yihan JC over an engagement letter dated 16 August 2016, under which Axis Megalink Sdn Bhd claimed a US$2m arranger fee from Far East Mining Pte Ltd for a proposed reverse takeover, with judgment delivered on 31 August 2023.

What legal issues did [2023] SGHC 243 raise?

The catchwords covered the tort of conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, unilateral mistake as to the identity of a contracting counterparty, and the attribution of an agent's knowledge of his own breach to his principal in agency law.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (20)

SG (2)
[2002] SGHC 222 [2017] SGHC 241
SLR (15)
[2000] 2 SLR(R) 407 [2001] 2 SLR(R) 435 [2003] 3 SLR(R) 501 [2005] 3 SLR(R) 283 [2007] 4 SLR(R) 855 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 80 [2010] 2 SLR 589 [2014] 1 SLR 860 [2016] 2 SLR 597 [2016] 3 SLR 845 [2017] 1 SLR 141 [2017] 1 SLR 654 [2018] 2 SLR 110 [2020] 2 SLR 20 [2022] 2 SLR 1250
UK (3)
[1928] AC 1 [2015] 2 WLR 1168 [2019] 3 WLR 997

Cited By (4)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 243)