Re: THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Hoo Sheau Peng |
| Charges / claim | Contempt of Court |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Chong Yong, Rimplejit Kaur, Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas |
Source: [2023] SGHC 321, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Attorney-General v Ravi s/o Madasamy and another matter [2023] SGHC 321 is a judgment of the General Division of the High Court delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng J on 8 November 2023 in Originating Summonses Nos 21 and 22 of 2022. It followed the court's earlier liability decision of 31 March 2023 ([2023] SGHC 78), in which Mr Ravi s/o Madasamy was found liable for nine instances of contempt under various limbs of s 3(1) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 on the Attorney-General's committal applications. This judgment sets out the reasoning following the further hearing on 23 October 2023, records 20 citations, and engages the framework of the AJPA for contempt of court.
[2023] SGHC 321 explained
Re: THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL ([2023] SGHC 321) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 8 November 2023. It is categorised under Contempt of Court. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC 321 about?
Re: THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL ([2023] SGHC 321) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Contempt of Court — Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC 321 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Legal Profession Act (Cap 161), Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGHC 321 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGHC 78. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
This was the sentencing decision in committal proceedings brought by the Attorney-General against lawyer Ravi s/o Madasamy, who had earlier been found liable for nine instances of contempt under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016, including scandalising a district judge and interrupting and insulting him in open court. The court weighed his bipolar disorder relapse as a moderate mitigating factor against aggravating factors including prior unheeded sanctions. Ravi was committed to 21 days' imprisonment.
What was Attorney-General v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2023] SGHC 321 about?
It was a High Court contempt matter before Hoo Sheau Peng J on 8 November 2023, following the Attorney-General's committal applications against Ravi s/o Madasamy under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 in Originating Summonses Nos 21 and 22 of 2022.
How many contempt findings were made against Ravi s/o Madasamy ([2023] SGHC 321)?
In the earlier liability judgment [2023] SGHC 78 of 31 March 2023, Hoo Sheau Peng J found Ravi s/o Madasamy liable for nine instances of contempt under various limbs of s 3(1) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (20)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 321)