Zhang Jinhua v Yip Zhao Lin

[2024] SGHC 180 High Court (General Division) 12 July 2024 • HC/OC 490/2023 ( HC/RA 80/2024 ) • 38 min read
10 cases cited (9 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Zhang Jinhua v Yip Zhao Lin [2024] SGHC 180 was an appeal heard in the General Division of the High Court by Mohamed Faizal JC, with judgment reserved and delivered on 12 July 2024 following the hearing on 7 June 2024 (Originating Claim No 490 of 2023, Registrar's Appeal No 80 of 2024). The appeal was brought against the decision of the Assistant Registrar to set aside a default judgment that the appellant, Zhang Jinhua, had obtained against the respondent, Yip Zhao Lin, in HC/JUD 359/2023. The default judgment arose from a deed entered into by the respondent, ostensibly in his personal capacity, on 3 October 2019, in which he promised to fully repay a sum of RMB38.04m by the end of 2019, failing which the amount would be due at a rate of 15% interest, with the respondent liable for costs.

The judgment records that the appellant commenced HC/OC 490/2023 on 31 July 2023 seeking payment as agreed in the deed. While the main issue on appeal concerned whether the default judgment should be set aside on the ground that the respondent possessed a prima facie defence suggestive of triable issues, Mohamed Faizal JC observed that the matter also highlighted the importance of selecting methods of substituted service most likely to be effective in giving notice of proceedings to the other party. The catchwords identify the issues as Civil Procedure — Service and Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders. Mr Kang Kok Boon, Favian of Adelphi Law Chambers LLC acted for the appellant, while Mr Liew Yik Wee and Ms Mariel Benicia Luz Nonis of Rev Law LLC acted for the respondent.

Summary

Zhang Jinhua appealed against an Assistant Registrar's decision to set aside a default judgment he had obtained against Yip Zhao Lin, which arose from a deed under which the respondent had promised to repay a sum of RMB38.04m. The appeal concerned whether the default judgment should be set aside on the basis that the respondent had a prima facie defence raising triable issues, and the case also highlighted the importance of selecting effective methods of substituted service. The General Division of the High Court found that the respondent had established a prima facie defence and ordered costs of S$9,000 to the respondent.

What was Zhang Jinhua v Yip Zhao Lin [2024] SGHC 180 about?

It was an appeal in the High Court against an Assistant Registrar's decision to set aside a default judgment obtained by Zhang Jinhua against Yip Zhao Lin. The judgment arose from a deed under which Yip promised to repay RMB38.04m by the end of 2019.

What sum was claimed in Zhang Jinhua v Yip Zhao Lin?

The claim arose from a deed dated 3 October 2019 in which Yip Zhao Lin promised to repay RMB38.04m by the end of 2019, failing which the amount would carry interest at 15%, with him liable for costs, according to the judgment.

Who decided Zhang Jinhua v Yip Zhao Lin [2024] SGHC 180?

Mohamed Faizal JC of the General Division of the High Court of Singapore decided the appeal, with judgment reserved and delivered on 12 July 2024 after the hearing on 7 June 2024 in Registrar's Appeal No 80 of 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (10)

SG (1)
[2016] SGHCR 7
SLR (8)
[2003] 3 SLR(R) 32 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 856 [2008] 4 SLR(R) 907 [2008] 4 SLR(R) 994 [2009] 3 SLR(R) 623 [2011] 2 SLR 232 [2019] 1 SLR 349 [2020] 2 SLR 1061
UK (1)
[1915] 1 KB 857

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 180)