ROHAN ST. GEORGE v 4FINGERS PTE LTD & ANOR
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
Rohan St George v 4Fingers Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHCR 9 was decided by AR Perry Peh in the General Division of the High Court in Originating Claim No 740 of 2023 (Summonses Nos 1276 and 1277 of 2024), heard on 12 June and 18 July 2024 with the grounds of decision issued on 23 August 2024. In HC/OC 740/2023 the claimant, Rohan St George, claimed against the first and second defendants for payments said to be due and owing in connection with his employment by the first defendant, 4Fingers Pte Ltd (a Singapore-incorporated company), while the defendants pursued counterclaims against the claimant for breaches of fiduciary and/or contractual duties owed to the first defendant, among others.
Two applications were before the court: HC/SUM 1277/2024, the claimant's application for production of documents by the defendants pursuant to O 11 r 3 of the Rules of Court 2021; and HC/SUM 1276/2024, the defendants' application to compel the claimant to provide the originals and native format of documents listed in the claimant's list of documents dated 22 April 2024 for inspection, pursuant to O 11 r 12(3) of the ROC 2021. Having considered the submissions, the court allowed both applications in part. The catchwords identify the issues as the production of documents and the inspection of the original of a document produced; the statutes noted include the Companies Act and the Evidence Act. Drew & Napier LLC acted for the claimant and LVM Law Chambers LLC for the defendants.
[2024] SGHCR 9 explained
ROHAN ST. GEORGE v 4FINGERS PTE LTD & ANOR ([2024] SGHCR 9) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 23 August 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHCR 9 about?
ROHAN ST. GEORGE v 4FINGERS PTE LTD & ANOR ([2024] SGHCR 9) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Production of documents” and “Civil Procedure — Production of documents — Inspection of original of document produced”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHCR 9 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50) and Evidence Act (Cap 97). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHCR 9 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHCR 8, [2024] SGHC 85, and [2024] SGHCR 4. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2024] SGHCR 9?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHCR 9 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
In the General Division of the High Court, the claimant, Mr Rohan St George, the former Executive Chairman/Interim CEO of 4Fingers Pte Ltd, sued that company and its majority shareholder for payments said to be due under his employment, while the defendants pursued counterclaims for breaches of fiduciary and contractual duties. Two applications were before the court: the claimant's application for production of documents and the defendants' application to compel the claimant to provide originals and native-format documents for inspection. Assistant Registrar Perry Peh allowed both applications in part and, on costs, awarded the defendants $9,000 for their inspection application.
What did Rohan St George v 4Fingers Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHCR 9 decide?
AR Perry Peh allowed both applications in part on 23 August 2024: the claimant's application (SUM 1277) for production of documents under O 11 r 3 of the Rules of Court 2021, and the defendants' application (SUM 1276) for inspection of originals under O 11 r 12(3).
What was the underlying claim in Rohan St George v 4Fingers Pte Ltd?
In Originating Claim No 740 of 2023, Rohan St George claimed payments allegedly due in connection with his employment by 4Fingers Pte Ltd, a Singapore-incorporated company, while the defendants counterclaimed for breaches of fiduciary and/or contractual duties owed to the first defendant.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (14)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHCR 9)