SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v STEEL CORP LIMITED
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Damages |
| Counsel | Fernandez LLC, RHTLaw Asia LLP, Lee Yun En, Lim Muhammad Syafiq, Mohamed Arshad bin Mohamed Tahir, Patrick Fernandez, Renganathan Nandakumar |
Source: [2025] SGHC 107, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 107 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 6 June 2025 concerning Damages, specifically addressing mitigation, compensation and damages, and measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Shri Bajrang Power and Ispat Limited (plaintiff) against Steel Corp Limited (defendant). Legal representation was provided by RHTLaw Asia LLP and Fernandez LLC. The judgment cites 6 cases (4 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Sale of Goods Act.
[2025] SGHC 107 explained
SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v STEEL CORP LIMITED ([2025] SGHC 107) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 June 2025. It is categorised under Damages. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 107 about?
SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v STEEL CORP LIMITED ([2025] SGHC 107) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Damages — Mitigation — Contract”, “Damages — Compensation and damages”, and “Damages — Measure of damages — Contract”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 107 consider?
The judgment refers to Sale of Goods Act (Cap 393) and Sale of Goods Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
An Indian steel producer claimed damages against a UK metal trader for breach of a sale and purchase agreement for 30,000 metric tons of steel making pig iron at US$381 per metric ton, after the defendant failed to deliver and later cited force majeure. The court awarded US$1,050,000 in damages, being the additional cost of approximately US$35 per metric ton that the claimant incurred in using steel scrap as a substitute, rejecting the claimant's larger claim based on Indian market resale prices.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 107?
[2025] SGHC 107 (SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v STEEL CORP LIMITED) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 6 June 2025 addressing Damages, specifically mitigation, compensation and damages, and measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v STEEL CORP LIMITED ([2025] SGHC 107)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 107 was Shri Bajrang Power and Ispat Limited, and the defendant was Steel Corp Limited. Legal representation included Fernandez LLC and RHTLaw Asia LLP. The case was decided on 6 June 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 107?
[2025] SGHC 107 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (General Division) on 6 June 2025. The case concerned Damages.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 107 cite?
[2025] SGHC 107 cites 6 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Sale of Goods Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (6)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 107)