TOH LAM SENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | See Kee Oon |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Chooi Jing Yen LLC, Chen Yongxin, Chooi Jing Yen, Emily Zhao, Sarah Siaw |
Source: [2025] SGHC 116, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 116 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 30 June 2025 concerning Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically addressing offences and sentencing. The judgment was delivered by See Kee Oon. The case was brought by Toh Lam Seng (appellant) against Public Prosecutor (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Chooi Jing Yen LLC and Attorney-General's Chambers. The judgment cites 25 cases and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, and the Misuse of Drugs Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 116 explained
TOH LAM SENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2025] SGHC 116) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 30 June 2025. It is categorised under Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 116 about?
TOH LAM SENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2025] SGHC 116) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Offences — Outrage of modesty”, “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Appeals”, and “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Persistent offenders”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 116 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Evidence Act (Cap 97), Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 116 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 102 and [2025] SGHC 45. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 116?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 116 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A man convicted of outraging the modesty of a 13-year-old girl appealed against conviction and his sentence of five years' corrective training, while the Prosecution cross-appealed seeking a heavier sentence. The court dismissed the appeal against conviction but allowed the Prosecution's cross-appeal, substituting seven years' preventive detention for the five years' corrective training, finding the appellant's extensive criminal history including prior sexual offences warranted a longer period of incapacitation.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 116?
[2025] SGHC 116 (TOH LAM SENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 30 June 2025 addressing Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically offences and sentencing. The judgment was delivered by See Kee Oon.
Who were the parties in TOH LAM SENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2025] SGHC 116)?
The appellant in [2025] SGHC 116 was Toh Lam Seng, and the respondent was Public Prosecutor. Legal representation included Chooi Jing Yen LLC and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 30 June 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 116?
[2025] SGHC 116 was delivered by See Kee Oon in the High Court (General Division) on 30 June 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 116 cite?
[2025] SGHC 116 cites 25 prior decisions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Evidence Act, Misuse of Drugs Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (25)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 116)