TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 123 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 1 July 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Tan & Au LLP and others (plaintiff) against Goh Teh Lee (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Advocatus Law LLP. The judgment cites 5 cases and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Act, the In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act, and the Insolvency.
Summary
A bankrupt applied to reduce his monthly contribution and target contribution set by the Official Assignee under s 86D(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, after the OA issued a replacement certificate correcting an earlier erroneous certificate. The court held the OA has power to issue a replacement certificate to correct errors, applied a standard of review examining whether the OA's decision was unreasonable or perverse, and reduced the monthly contribution from $100 to $50 given the bankrupt's age (68) and health conditions.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 123?
[2025] SGHC 123 (TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 1 July 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.
Who were the parties in TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 123 was Tan & Au LLP, Tan Beng Hui Carolyn, and the defendant was Goh Teh Lee. Legal representation included Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office and Advocatus Law LLP. The case was decided on 1 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 123?
[2025] SGHC 123 was delivered by Audrey Lim in the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 123 cite?
[2025] SGHC 123 cites 5 prior decisions. It references Bankruptcy Act, In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act, Insolvency.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 123)