NG SAY KEONG v JIA LE ALUMINIUM PTE. LTD. & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Dedar Singh Gill |
| Charges / claim | Intellectual Property |
| Counsel | Chow Ng Partnership, Gateway Law Corporation, Annie Dai Jingwen, Chow Weng Weng, Chua Yung Guang Mitchel, Ng Chee Weng |
Source: [2025] SGHC 243, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 243 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 5 December 2025 concerning Intellectual Property, specifically addressing patents and inventions and trade marks and trade names. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill. The case was brought by Ng Say Keong (plaintiff) against 9 Power Aluminium & Glass Pte Ltd and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Gateway Law Corporation and Chow Ng Partnership. The judgment cites 27 cases (22 Singapore, 5 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Patents Act.
[2025] SGHC 243 explained
NG SAY KEONG v JIA LE ALUMINIUM PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 243) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 5 December 2025. It is categorised under Intellectual Property. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 243 about?
NG SAY KEONG v JIA LE ALUMINIUM PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 243) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Intellectual Property — Patents and inventions — Invalidity”, “Intellectual Property — Patents and inventions — Infringement”, and “Intellectual Property — Trade marks and trade names — Passing off — Misrepresentation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 243 consider?
The judgment refers to Patents Act (Cap 221). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A sole proprietor of a door manufacturing business sued two related companies for patent infringement and passing off involving an innovative door design. The court found the patent valid but not infringed, as the defendants' door design fell outside the patent claims, but held that the defendants engaged in intentional passing off by showing a genuine sample of the claimant's door to customers and then supplying their own inferior product.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 243?
[2025] SGHC 243 (NG SAY KEONG v JIA LE ALUMINIUM PTE. LTD. & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 5 December 2025 addressing Intellectual Property, specifically patents and inventions and trade marks and trade names. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill.
Who were the parties in NG SAY KEONG v JIA LE ALUMINIUM PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 243)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 243 was Ng Say Keong, and the defendant was 9 Power Aluminium & Glass Pte Ltd, Jia Le Aluminium Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Gateway Law Corporation and Chow Ng Partnership. The case was decided on 5 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 243?
[2025] SGHC 243 was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill in the High Court (General Division) on 5 December 2025. The case concerned Intellectual Property.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 243 cite?
[2025] SGHC 243 cites 27 prior decisions, including 5 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Patents Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (27)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 243)