Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Dedar Singh Gill |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin, Ng Yuan Siang |
Source: [2025] SGHC 248, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 248 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 9 December 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill. The case was brought by Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (applicant) against Lee Chin Sze (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 11 cases (10 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act and the International Arbitration Act.
[2025] SGHC 248 explained
Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze ([2025] SGHC 248) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 248 about?
Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze ([2025] SGHC 248) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 248 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10) and International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
Q&M Dental Group sought to set aside a partial arbitral award in a dispute over a shareholders' agreement for a Malaysian dental practice, arguing the tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction and breached natural justice. The court dismissed the application, finding the tribunal's determination that Q&M's call option was validly exercised and precluded a later put option fell within the scope of the respondent's alternative pleaded case.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 248?
[2025] SGHC 248 (Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 9 December 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill.
Who were the parties in Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze ([2025] SGHC 248)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 248 was Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, and the respondent was Lee Chin Sze. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The case was decided on 9 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 248?
[2025] SGHC 248 was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill in the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 248 cite?
[2025] SGHC 248 cites 11 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, International Arbitration Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 248)