Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 248 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 9 December 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill. The case was brought by Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (applicant) against Lee Chin Sze (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 11 cases (10 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act and the International Arbitration Act.
Summary
Q&M Dental Group sought to set aside a partial arbitral award in a dispute over a shareholders' agreement for a Malaysian dental practice, arguing the tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction and breached natural justice. The court dismissed the application, finding the tribunal's determination that Q&M's call option was validly exercised and precluded a later put option fell within the scope of the respondent's alternative pleaded case.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 248?
[2025] SGHC 248 (Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 9 December 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill.
Who were the parties in Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Sze?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 248 was Q&M Dental Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, and the respondent was Lee Chin Sze. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The case was decided on 9 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 248?
[2025] SGHC 248 was delivered by Dedar Singh Gill in the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 248 cite?
[2025] SGHC 248 cites 11 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, International Arbitration Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 248)