HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors
Outcome
Application allowedI allowed the application on the condition that the appellant pay the outstanding costs by 22 September 2025, failing which its appeal would stand struck out automatically.
Source: [2025] SGHC 250, High Court (General Division), decided 9 December 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Aidan Xu |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Application allowed |
| Counsel | I.R.B. Law LLP, M Shafiq Chambers LLC, Mohamed Baiross, Mohammad Shafiq bin Haja Maideen, Sharifah Nabilah Binte Syed Omar |
Source: [2025] SGHC 250, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 250 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 9 December 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing striking out and appeals. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu. The case was brought by Hahnemann Travel & Tours Pte Ltd (appellant) against Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Yusoff and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by M Shafiq Chambers LLC and I.R.B. Law LLP. The judgment cites 2 cases.
[2025] SGHC 250 explained
HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 250) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 250 about?
HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 250) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Striking out” and “Civil Procedure — Appeals — Amendment of notice of appeal”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 250?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 250 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A travel agent appealed a District Judge's decision on costs and sought to amend its notice of appeal to include an appeal on the merits in a defamation claim it had brought against former clients who complained about its Umrah pilgrimage services. The court allowed the amendment but made it conditional on full payment of outstanding costs by a deadline; the appellant failed to comply, and the appeal was automatically struck out.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 250?
[2025] SGHC 250 (HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 9 December 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically striking out and appeals. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu.
Who were the parties in HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 250)?
The appellant in [2025] SGHC 250 was Hahnemann Travel & Tours Pte Ltd, and the respondent was Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Yusoff, Amelina Abdul Ghani. Legal representation included I.R.B. Law LLP and M Shafiq Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 9 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 250?
[2025] SGHC 250 was delivered by Aidan Xu in the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 250)