HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors

[2025] SGHC 250 High Court (General Division) 9 December 2025 • HC/DCA 9/2025 ( HC/SUM 20005/2025 ) • 18 min read
2 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Striking out Civil Procedure — Appeals — Amendment of notice of appeal

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Aidan Xu Delivered

Counsel (5)

I.R.B. Law LLP Firm M Shafiq Chambers LLC Firm Mohamed Baiross Counsel Respondent Mohammad Shafiq bin Haja Maideen Counsel Appellant Sharifah Nabilah Binte Syed Omar Counsel Respondent

Parties (5)

Hahnemann Travel & Tours Pte Ltd Appellant Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Yusoff Respondent Amelina Abdul Ghani Respondent Amylia Abdul Ghani Respondent Hasnah Bte Abdullah Respondent

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 250 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 9 December 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing striking out and appeals. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu. The case was brought by Hahnemann Travel & Tours Pte Ltd (appellant) against Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Yusoff and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by M Shafiq Chambers LLC and I.R.B. Law LLP. The judgment cites 2 cases.

Summary

A travel agent appealed a District Judge's decision on costs and sought to amend its notice of appeal to include an appeal on the merits in a defamation claim it had brought against former clients who complained about its Umrah pilgrimage services. The court allowed the amendment but made it conditional on full payment of outstanding costs by a deadline; the appellant failed to comply, and the appeal was automatically struck out.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 250?

[2025] SGHC 250 (HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 9 December 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically striking out and appeals. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu.

Who were the parties in HAHNEMANN TRAVEL & TOURS PTE LTD v Hasnah Bte Abdullah & 3 Ors?

The appellant in [2025] SGHC 250 was Hahnemann Travel & Tours Pte Ltd, and the respondent was Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Yusoff, Amelina Abdul Ghani. Legal representation included I.R.B. Law LLP and M Shafiq Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 9 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 250?

[2025] SGHC 250 was delivered by Aidan Xu in the High Court (General Division) on 9 December 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.

Cases Cited (2)

SG (2)
[2022] SGHC(A) 28 [2023] SGHC 111

Cited By (1)

[2026] SGCA 7
Owner of the vessel(s) CHLOE V (IMO No. 9457452) v UBS AG

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 250)