Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.

[2026] SGHC 35 High Court (General Division) 13 February 2026 • HC/CWU 462/2025 • 17 min read
6 cases cited

Catchwords

Companies – Winding up – Just and equitable ground Insolvency Law – Winding up – Grounds for petition

Practice Areas

Companies Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Philip Jeyaretnam Delivered

Counsel (8)

Fortress Law Corporation Firm Invictus Law Corporation Firm Resource Law LLC Firm Aw Hon Wei Adrian Counsel Third Party Tessa Lim Yong Rong Counsel Third Party Trent Ng Yong En Counsel Applicant Wong Chiun Yun, Emily Counsel Applicant Yeo Hsien Yang Shane Anthony (Yang Xianyang) Counsel Third Party

Parties (4)

Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. Respondent Bryan Lim Jun Da Applicant Koh Jia Jun Third Party Ong Tee Hong Third Party

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 35 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 13 February 2026 concerning Companies and Insolvency Law, specifically addressing winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. The case was brought by Bryan Lim Jun Da (applicant) against Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Fortress Law Corporation. The judgment cites 6 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Companies Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Summary

A homeowner sued an interior design company for defective renovation works and sought damages for the cost of rectification. The High Court assessed the scope of defective works and the appropriate quantum of damages for the homeowner's claim.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 35?

[2026] SGHC 35 (Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 13 February 2026 addressing Companies and Insolvency Law, specifically winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.

Who were the parties in Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.?

The applicant in [2026] SGHC 35 was Bryan Lim Jun Da, and the respondent was Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included Invictus Law Corporation and Fortress Law Corporation. The case was decided on 13 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 35?

[2026] SGHC 35 was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam in the High Court (General Division) on 13 February 2026. The case concerned Companies and Insolvency Law.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 35 cite?

[2026] SGHC 35 cites 6 prior decisions. It references Companies Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act (Cap 50)
s 182 s 216A
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
Restructuring and Dissolution Act

Cases Cited (6)

SG (1)
[2020] SGHC 96
SLR (5)
[2019] 1 SLR 1046 [2021] 2 SLR 478 [2024] 4 SLR 258 [2025] 1 SLR 141 [2025] 4 SLR 1580

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 35)