Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Philip Jeyaretnam |
| Charges / claim | Companies, Insolvency Law |
| Counsel | Fortress Law Corporation, Invictus Law Corporation, Resource Law LLC, Aw Hon Wei Adrian, Tessa Lim Yong Rong, Trent Ng Yong En, Wong Chiun Yun, Emily, Yeo Hsien Yang Shane Anthony (Yang Xianyang) |
Source: [2026] SGHC 35, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 35 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 13 February 2026 concerning Companies and Insolvency Law, specifically addressing winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. The case was brought by Bryan Lim Jun Da (applicant) against Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Fortress Law Corporation. The judgment cites 6 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Companies Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
[2026] SGHC 35 explained
Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 35) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 13 February 2026. It is categorised under Companies and Insolvency Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 35 about?
Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 35) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Companies – Winding up – Just and equitable ground” and “Insolvency Law – Winding up – Grounds for petition”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 35 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A homeowner sued an interior design company for defective renovation works and sought damages for the cost of rectification. The High Court assessed the scope of defective works and the appropriate quantum of damages for the homeowner's claim.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 35?
[2026] SGHC 35 (Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 13 February 2026 addressing Companies and Insolvency Law, specifically winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.
Who were the parties in Bryan Lim Jun Da v Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 35)?
The applicant in [2026] SGHC 35 was Bryan Lim Jun Da, and the respondent was Interior Times (Conquest) Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included Invictus Law Corporation and Fortress Law Corporation. The case was decided on 13 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 35?
[2026] SGHC 35 was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam in the High Court (General Division) on 13 February 2026. The case concerned Companies and Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 35 cite?
[2026] SGHC 35 cites 6 prior decisions. It references Companies Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (6)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 35)