ARFAT PANNIR SELVAM & 2 Ors v SHARAD SELVAM RAMACHANDRA
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Tan Siong Thye |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Chin Tian Hui Joshua, Claire Neoh Kai Xin, Hing Shan Shan Blossom |
Source: [2026] SGHC 56, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
[2026] SGHC 56 explained
ARFAT PANNIR SELVAM & 2 Ors v SHARAD SELVAM RAMACHANDRA ([2026] SGHC 56) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 16 March 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 56 about?
ARFAT PANNIR SELVAM & 2 Ors v SHARAD SELVAM RAMACHANDRA ([2026] SGHC 56) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Injunctions — ¬¬Setting aside ex parte order” and “Civil Procedure — Anton Piller orders — Setting aside ex parte order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Cases Cited (7)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 56)