YANG HONG v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE (TANGLIN POLICE DIVISION)
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Randeep Singh Koonar |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Ho May Kim, Lewis Tan |
Source: [2026] SGHCR 1, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHCR 1 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 7 January 2026 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing costs. The judgment was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar. The case was brought by Yang Hong (applicant) against Commissioner of Police, Singapore Police Force (Tanglin Police Division) (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers. The judgment cites 8 cases (6 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Government Proceedings Act, and the Penal Code.
[2026] SGHCR 1 explained
YANG HONG v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE (TANGLIN POLICE DIVISION) ([2026] SGHCR 1) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 7 January 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHCR 1 about?
YANG HONG v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE (TANGLIN POLICE DIVISION) ([2026] SGHCR 1) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Costs — Security — Whether different principles for ordering security for costs apply in judicial review proceedings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHCR 1 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Government Proceedings Act (Cap 121), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
In a novel question of law, a respondent in judicial review proceedings sought security for costs against an applicant challenging police decisions. The court rejected the argument that different principles should apply for security for costs in judicial review proceedings, ordered the applicant to furnish $10,000 in security, and stayed the proceedings pending compliance.
What was decided in [2026] SGHCR 1?
[2026] SGHCR 1 (YANG HONG v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE (TANGLIN POLICE DIVISION)) is a High Court Registrar decision from 7 January 2026 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically costs. The judgment was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar.
Who were the parties in YANG HONG v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE (TANGLIN POLICE DIVISION) ([2026] SGHCR 1)?
The applicant in [2026] SGHCR 1 was Yang Hong, and the respondent was Commissioner of Police, Singapore Police Force (Tanglin Police Division). Legal representation included Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 7 January 2026 in the High Court Registrar.
Which judge decided [2026] SGHCR 1?
[2026] SGHCR 1 was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar in the High Court Registrar on 7 January 2026. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHCR 1 cite?
[2026] SGHCR 1 cites 8 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Government Proceedings Act, Penal Code.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (8)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCR 1)