What can I do if my lawyer overcharges in Singapore?

Answered from official Singapore sources and the reported court record, as of — recomputed live.

A client who disputes a bill can ask the court to assess — to tax — the solicitor's costs under the Legal Profession Act, complain to the Law Society about overcharging, and, where loss results, pursue a negligence claim. Assessment tests whether the charges are fair and reasonable.

What the question is really asking

When a client considers a solicitor's bill excessive, Singapore law provides several distinct routes, each answering a different question. The first is assessment of costs, sometimes called taxation. Under the Legal Profession Act a client may apply to the court to have the solicitor's bill assessed, and the court examines whether the fees charged are fair and reasonable having regard to the work done, the complexity of the matter and the other relevant circumstances. Assessment does not assume overcharging; it independently tests the reasonableness of the charges.

A second route is a complaint to the Law Society of Singapore. Gross overcharging can amount to a disciplinary matter, and the professional disciplinary process examines the solicitor's conduct rather than simply the amount of the bill. This route is about professional standards, and its outcomes are sanctions on conduct, not a refund as such — though the two routes can run in parallel where both reasonableness and conduct are in issue.

A third route arises where a client has suffered loss through negligent work, which may found a civil claim in professional negligence. These routes are conceptually separate: assessment asks whether a bill is reasonable, a disciplinary complaint asks whether conduct crossed a professional line, and a negligence claim asks whether careless work caused loss. What the courts have actually ordered in costs, across the reported judgments, gives an objective sense of how costs are quantified — distinct from what any private lawyer charges a client under a retainer.

Official sources & how it works

The instruments and public records that govern the answer, each with its source and the year it describes.

Legal Profession Act 1966 (Singapore)

The Act provides for the assessment (taxation) of a solicitor's bill of costs and the standard by which fair and reasonable charges are tested, as well as the disciplinary framework applying to gross overcharging.

Source: Legal Profession Act 1966 (Singapore) · as of 2020

Law Society of Singapore

The professional body that receives complaints about advocates and solicitors, including complaints alleging gross overcharging, and administers the statutory disciplinary process.

Source: Law Society of Singapore · as of 2026

How can a solicitor's bill be challenged?

A client may apply under the Legal Profession Act to have the bill assessed by the court, a process sometimes called taxation. The court examines whether the charges are fair and reasonable in light of the work done and the matter's complexity. Assessment is an independent test of reasonableness rather than an assumption that overcharging occurred.

Is overcharging a disciplinary matter?

Gross overcharging can be a matter for the Law Society's disciplinary process, which examines the solicitor's professional conduct rather than only the amount of the bill. That route addresses professional standards and can lead to sanctions on conduct, and it can run alongside an application to assess the reasonableness of the bill itself.

How is this different from what a lawyer charges privately?

A private fee is a matter of the retainer between a lawyer and client. Assessment tests whether that bill is reasonable, while court-ordered costs — what a losing party pays a winning party — are set by the court under its own rules. The reported court record shows what courts awarded in costs, which is distinct from any private fee.

Explore the court record

This is one part of what the reported record shows about how lawyers and litigation work in Singapore.

Methodology & disclaimer

This page explains the question factually from cited Singapore legislation, official public records and the reported Supreme Court court record. It describes how a process or requirement works in general; it does not tell any particular person what to do, is not a recommendation of any lawyer or firm, and is not legal advice. How a specific matter should be handled depends on its facts and is a question for a qualified lawyer.