CSDS AIRCRAFT SALES & LEASING INC. v SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED
Key facts
| Court | Court of Appeal (International) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Beverley McLachlin, Steven Chong |
| Charges / claim | Damages, Evidence |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Tan Rajah & Cheah, Kenneth Kwek Junjie, Marissa Daisy Decruz, Shobna Chandran, Tan Teck San Kelvin, Thaddaeus Aaron Tan, Yip Ting Yuan Darren, Yong Manling Jasmine |
Source: [2023] SGCA(I) 5, Court of Appeal (International), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (2)
Counsel (9)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Limited [2023] SGCA(I) 5 comprises the grounds of decision of the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No 8 of 2022, delivered on 19 June 2023, with Steven Chong JCA delivering the decision of the court sitting with Beverley McLachlin IJ. The appeal concerned an award of damages by an International Judge of the Singapore International Commercial Court in Singapore Airlines Ltd v CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc [2022] SGHC(I) 15. Under an agreement dated 19 September 2018, the appellant CSDS had contracted to buy a Boeing 777-212 aircraft without engines from Singapore Airlines for US$6.5m, paying a US$250,000 deposit but failing to pay the US$6.25m balance; the SICC had found CSDS in repudiatory breach, accepted by SIA as ending the contract on 4 November 2018. The catchwords address the aircraft's valuation and the weight of expert opinion evidence.
What was CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Limited [2023] SGCA(I) 5 about?
It was a Court of Appeal decision of 19 June 2023, with Steven Chong JCA delivering the grounds, on an appeal against a Singapore International Commercial Court damages award after CSDS failed to complete its purchase of a Boeing 777-212 aircraft from Singapore Airlines.
What were the aircraft purchase terms in [2023] SGCA(I) 5?
Under an agreement dated 19 September 2018, CSDS agreed to buy a Boeing 777-212 aircraft without engines for US$6.5m, paying a US$250,000 deposit but failing to pay the US$6.25m balance, leading to a repudiatory breach accepted on 4 November 2018.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (12)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGCA(I) 5)