YAM v YAN

[2026] SGHCF 14 High Court (Family Division) 12 May 2026 • HCF/DT 3533/2023 • 104 min read
27 cases cited

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

YAM v YAN [2026] SGHCF 14, decided by Justice Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi on 12 May 2026, resolved the ancillary matters arising from a 17-year-and-3-month marriage (wed 13 October 2006, interim judgment granted 15 January 2024) involving four children and a husband who owns and operates two restaurants. The three contested issues were the division of matrimonial assets, wife's maintenance, and child maintenance for the four children aged 9, 11, 14, and 18 in 2026. The wife — a 42-year-old freelance tuition teacher — was represented by Hoh Law Corporation (Yeow Tin Tin Margaret and Lim Yi Hui Louise), while the husband — a 59-year-old chef-owner — was represented by Tan Rajah & Cheah (Chen Yixin Edith).

Summary

A wife and husband who had been married for approximately 17 years and had four children appeared before the High Court (Family Division) for determination of ancillary matters following an uncontested divorce, with disputes over the division of matrimonial assets (including two restaurants owned by the husband and Australian properties held by the wife), spousal maintenance, and child maintenance. The court divided the matrimonial assets, made no order as to spousal maintenance, and ordered the wife to pay monthly child maintenance of S$600 to the husband, who had care and control of the children.

What ancillary issues did the High Court Family Division decide in YAM v YAN [2026] SGHCF 14?

Justice Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi resolved the division of matrimonial assets, spousal maintenance for the wife, and child maintenance for four children following a 17-year marriage. Interim judgment for divorce was granted on 15 January 2024; the wife is a freelance tuition teacher aged 42 and the husband is a 59-year-old restaurant owner.

Statutes Cited

Central Provident Fund Act
s 27E
Family Justice Act

Cases Cited (27)

SG (7)
[2016] SGCA 2 [2023] SGHC(A) 28 [2023] SGHCF 14 [2023] SGHCF 3 [2024] SGHCF 22 [2025] SGHCF 14 [2026] SGHCF 4
SLR (20)
[2009] 4 SLR(R) 935 [2012] 2 SLR 506 [2012] 4 SLR 405 [2014] 4 SLR 559 [2015] 2 SLR 195 [2015] 4 SLR 1043 [2016] 4 SLR 674 [2017] 1 SLR 609 [2019] 1 SLR 608 [2020] 2 SLR 588 [2021] 1 SLR 426 [2022] 5 SLR 301 [2023] 1 SLR 1260 [2024] 1 SLR 158 [2024] 1 SLR 437 [2024] 1 SLR 459 [2025] 2 SLR 501 [2025] 3 SLR 1219 [2026] 1 SLR 187 [2026] 3 SLR 426

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCF 14)