Central Provident Fund Act

10 judgments · 4 courts · 4 cited sections

The Central Provident Fund Act has been cited, interpreted or applied in 10 Singapore judgments in this corpus, spanning 4 distinct sections. The decisions below are the primary source for how the courts have read it. This page reports those decisions; it is not legal advice.

Which sections of the Central Provident Fund Act have the courts cited?

Sections of Central Provident Fund Act referenced across the 10 judgments below.

s 7(1) s 25A s 27E s 71(4)

Which cases interpret the Central Provident Fund Act?

[2026] SGHCF 14
YAM v YAN
12 May 2026
SGHCF
[2026] SGFC 67
YDD v YDE
5 May 2026
SGFC
[2026] SGDC 82
Zeus Matisse v ESA Security Pte. Ltd.
9 March 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGFC 27
XZK v XZL
28 February 2026
SGFC
[2026] SGHC 26
GRACE CHIA JUNE THEO (XIE YUNZHEN) MRS GRACE DONEY & 3 Ors v SELVAKUMAR RANJAN & Anor
30 January 2026
SGHC
[2025] SGHCF 61
XRV v XRW
31 October 2025
SGHCF
[2025] SGHCF 57
XPA v XPB
29 September 2025
SGHCF
[2025] SGHCF 54
VBR v VBS
2 September 2025
SGHCF
[2025] SGHC 112
Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh
1 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCF 18
XIW v XIX
5 March 2025
SGHCF

Read the statute

The authoritative, consolidated text of the Central Provident Fund Act is published by the Singapore government on Singapore Statutes Online. We link to the primary source rather than reproduce it.

Search Singapore Statutes Online (sso.agc.gov.sg) ↗

Compiled by the SG Case Law editorial team from primary sources — the judgments themselves and Singapore Statutes Online (sso.agc.gov.sg). · Updated 24 June 2026 · How we compile this