XRV v XRW

Q: Which legislation does [2025] SGHCF 61 consider?

The judgment refers to Central Provident Fund Act and Family Justice Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2025] SGHCF 61 High Court (Family Division) 31 October 2025 HCF/DT 1197/2023 51 min read

14 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	31 October 2025
Judge	Teh Hwee Hwee
Charges / claim	Family Law
Counsel	Alain A Johns Partnership, Titanium Law Chambers LLC, Alain Abraham Johns, Danker Geralyn Germaine, Emira binte Abdul Razakjr, Lim Ying Ying, Swatthi d/o Mohan

Source: [2025] SGHCF 61, High Court (Family Division), decided 31 October 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Teh Hwee Hwee Delivered

Counsel (7)

Alain A Johns Partnership Firm Titanium Law Chambers LLC Firm Alain Abraham Johns Counsel Plaintiff Danker Geralyn Germaine Counsel Defendant Emira binte Abdul Razakjr Counsel Plaintiff Lim Ying Ying Counsel Defendant Swatthi d/o Mohan Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

XRV Plaintiff XRW Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCF 61 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 31 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Teh Hwee Hwee. The case was brought by XRV (plaintiff) against XRW (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Alain A Johns Partnership and Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 14 cases and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Central Provident Fund Act and the Family Justice Act.

[2025] SGHCF 61 explained

XRV v XRW ([2025] SGHCF 61) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 31 October 2025. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGHCF 61 about?

XRV v XRW ([2025] SGHCF 61) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2025] SGHCF 61 consider?

The judgment refers to Central Provident Fund Act and Family Justice Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHCF 61 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC(A) 2 and [2024] SGHCF 24. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

How influential is [2025] SGHCF 61?

Within this corpus, [2025] SGHCF 61 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

A dispute over the division of matrimonial assets in a 22-year marriage where the main contested issue was the value of properties held through the husband's company. The court divided the assets 67.285:32.715 in favour of the wife, finding the husband had failed to make full disclosure and drawing an adverse inference against him.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 61?

[2025] SGHCF 61 (XRV v XRW) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 31 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Teh Hwee Hwee.

Who were the parties in XRV v XRW ([2025] SGHCF 61)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCF 61 was XRV, and the defendant was XRW. Legal representation included Titanium Law Chambers LLC and Alain A Johns Partnership. The case was decided on 31 October 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).