VBR v VBS
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCF 54 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 2 September 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by VBR (appellant) against VBS (respondent). The judgment cites 7 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Central Provident Fund Act, the This Order is made subject to the Central Provident Fund Act, and the Women's Charter. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
Summary
A father appealed against the District Judge's order on child maintenance for two children aged 16 and 13, arguing the reasonable expenses were overestimated. The court allowed the appeal in part, reducing some expense items such as enrichment activities from $800 to $600 per child, but dismissed the appeal on accommodation expenses and the proportionality of contributions.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 54?
[2025] SGHCF 54 (VBR v VBS) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2 September 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in VBR v VBS?
The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 54 was VBR, and the respondent was VBS. The case was decided on 2 September 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCF 54?
[2025] SGHCF 54 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (Family Division) on 2 September 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCF 54 cite?
[2025] SGHCF 54 cites 7 prior decisions. It references Central Provident Fund Act, This Order is made subject to the Central Provident Fund Act, Women's Charter. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (7)
Cited By (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCF 54)