Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh

[2025] SGHC 112 High Court (General Division) 1 July 2025 HC/OA 1057/2024 29 min read
17 cases cited (13 SG, 4 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Valerie Thean
Charges / claim Probate and Administration, Family Law
Counsel WNLEX LLC, Ong Xin Ying Samantha

Source: [2025] SGHC 112, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 112 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 1 July 2025 concerning Family Law and Probate and Administration, specifically addressing intestate succession and void marriage. The judgment was delivered by Valerie Thean. The case was brought by Cheng Tze Tzuen (claimant) against Dang Lan Anh (defendant). Legal representation was provided by WNLEX LLC. The judgment cites 17 cases (13 Singapore, 4 foreign) and references 11 statutory provisions, including the Adoption of Children Act, the Central Provident Fund Act, and the Civil Law Act.

[2025] SGHC 112 explained

Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh ([2025] SGHC 112) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. It is categorised under Probate and Administration and Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGHC 112 about?

Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh ([2025] SGHC 112) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Probate and Administration — Intestate succession” and “Family Law — Void marriage — Whether marriage entered before 1 October 2016 can be void for being a marriage of convenience”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 112 consider?

The judgment refers to Adoption of Children Act (Cap 4), Adoption of Children Act, Central Provident Fund Act, and Civil Law Act (Cap 43), among other provisions. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 112 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHCF 15. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

How influential is [2025] SGHC 112?

Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 112 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

A son challenged the validity of his deceased father's marriage to a Vietnamese national, seeking a declaration that the marriage was void as a marriage of convenience under s 11A of the Women's Charter to claim a larger share of the estate. The court made no order on the application, finding that s 11A only applies to marriages solemnised on or after 1 October 2016 and the marriage in question was contracted in 2011, and that the claimant should instead pursue statutory procedures at the Family Justice Courts.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 112?

[2025] SGHC 112 (Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 1 July 2025 addressing Family Law and Probate and Administration, specifically intestate succession and void marriage. The judgment was delivered by Valerie Thean.

Who were the parties in Cheng Tze Tzuen v Dang Lan Anh ([2025] SGHC 112)?

The claimant in [2025] SGHC 112 was Cheng Tze Tzuen, and the defendant was Dang Lan Anh. Legal representation included WNLEX LLC. The case was decided on 1 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 112?

[2025] SGHC 112 was delivered by Valerie Thean in the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. The case concerned Family Law and Probate and Administration.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 112 cite?

[2025] SGHC 112 cites 17 prior decisions, including 4 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Adoption of Children Act, Central Provident Fund Act, Civil Law Act.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (17)

SG (2)
[2019] SGCA 61 [2025] SGHCF 15
SLR (11)
[1992] 1 SLR(R) 335 [1993] 1 SLR(R) 90 [2009] 3 SLR(R) 957 [2011] 1 SLR 737 [2012] 2 SLR 143 [2016] 5 SLR 693 [2018] 1 SLR 1015 [2019] 3 SLR 874 [2019] 5 SLR 812 [2020] 1 SLR 950 [2025] 3 SLR 16
UK (2)
[1902] 1 Ch 723 [1985] 3 All ER 455
AU (2)
[2013] NSWSC 903 [2016] NSWSC 427

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 112)