SHAW TOWERS REALTY (PTE) LIMITED v Chief Assessor
Featured in the weekly digest — week of 15–21 June 2026 →
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure, Revenue Law |
| Counsel | Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division), Tang Thomas LLC, Benedict Tedjopranoto, Dong Yuhui, Pang Mei Yu, Raj Joshua Thomas, Vigneesh s/o Nainar |
Source: [2026] SGHC 131, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
In Shaw Towers Realty (Pte) Ltd v Chief Assessor [2026] SGHC 131, Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J heard on 25 March and 29 May 2026 an application by Shaw Towers Realty for an extension of time to appeal a Valuation Review Board decision concerning the annual value of its property, TS 12 Lot 564X, a dispute with the Chief Assessor of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore dating back to Shaw Towers’ original 2023 appeal to the VRB. The 17 June 2026 judgment addressed the anterior question of which categories of Valuation Review Board decisions are amenable to appeal to the General Division of the High Court, drawing on 17 cited authorities and three statutes: the Interpretation Act, the Property Tax Act, and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act.
[2026] SGHC 131 explained
SHAW TOWERS REALTY (PTE) LIMITED v Chief Assessor ([2026] SGHC 131) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 17 June 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure and Revenue Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 131 about?
SHAW TOWERS REALTY (PTE) LIMITED v Chief Assessor ([2026] SGHC 131) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Appeals” and “Revenue Law — Property tax — Appeals”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 131 consider?
The judgment refers to Interpretation Act (Cap 1), Property Tax Act (Cap 254), Property Tax Act, and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 131 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 112. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What issue did the High Court address in Shaw Towers Realty v Chief Assessor ([2026] SGHC 131)?
In Originating Application No 32 of 2026, decided 17 June 2026, Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J considered which Valuation Review Board decisions on annual value — concerning Shaw Towers Realty’s property TS 12 Lot 564X — are appealable to the High Court under the Property Tax Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (17)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 131)