Leading Revenue Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

9 reported cases · March 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Revenue Law?

Singapore courts issued 9 reported Revenue Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (8), of the 4 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (2). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 9 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (3) · 2025 (2) · 2024 (2) · 2023 (2)
By court SGHC (8) · SGHC(A) (1)
Outcomes (4 parseable) Appeal dismissed (2) · Appeal allowed (1) · Application dismissed (1)
Most active counsel Pang Mei Yu (3) · Benedict Tedjopranoto (2) · Chen Rong (2) · Dong Yuhui (2) · Li Yourui Charles (2)

Compiled from 9 reported Revenue Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 9 reported Revenue Law judgments in Singapore courts (March 2023 to June 2026), Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division) is the most active firm by reported case count (8 cases), Pang Mei Yu is the most active lawyer (3 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Revenue Law appears in 9 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Income taxation — Capital allowance (2), Income taxation — Appeals (1) and Income taxation — Avoidance (1). The most active judge by reported case count is Choo Han Teck (4 cases) and the most active firm is Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division) (8 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Revenue Law cases in Singapore?

Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division) leads in Revenue Law with 8 cases between March 2023 and June 2026, followed by Allen & Gledhill LLP (2 cases) and Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (2 cases). 8 firms appeared in Revenue Law cases during this period.

Who are the leading Revenue Law lawyers in Singapore?

Pang Mei Yu is the most active Revenue Law lawyer in Singapore with 3 case appearances between March 2023 and June 2026, followed by Bjorn Lee Long Jin (3) and Li Yourui Charles (2).

Which judges handle the most Revenue Law cases in Singapore?

Choo Han Teck has handled 4 Revenue Law cases between March 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. See Kee Oon (1 cases) and Debbie Ong Siew Ling (1 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Revenue Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?

9 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Revenue Law, most often decided by Choo Han Teck.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Revenue Law cases?

The main sub-topics are Income taxation — Capital allowance (2), Income taxation — Appeals (1) and Income taxation — Avoidance (1).

Case Volume by Year

2
23
2
24
2
25
3
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Goods and Services Tax — Goods and Services Tax Act sections 45, 49, and 51 1 case

Income taxation — Appeals — Whether expenditure eligible for capital allowance — Whether asset considered “plant” or structure 1 case

Goods and Services Tax (GST) — Appeals — Whether appeal on fact or law 1 case

Goods and Services Tax (GST) — Appeals — Scope of appeal from decision of GST Board of Review 1 case

Goods and Services Tax (GST) — Appeals — Appeal on “question of law” and “question of mixed law and fact” 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 6 cases
cited in 3 cases
GST Act
cited in 3 cases
cited in 2 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 1 case
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
Broadcasting Act
cited in 1 case
UK Customs and Inland Revenue Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
UK Value Added Tax Act
cited in 1 case
VAT Act
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.