CNA v CNB & Anor
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Philip Jeyaretnam, Simon Thorley, Yuko Miyazaki |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Bae, Kim & Lee LLC, Drew & Napier LLC, Duxton Hill Chambers, KL Partners, Lee & Ko, Providence Law LLC, Rachel Low LLC, Seoul National University, WongPartnership LLP, Alston Yeong, Cavinder Bull, Chan Hock Keng, Chen Chi, Chi Ho Kwan, Han Gil Lee, Ing Loong Yang, Junwoo Kim (alias Junu Kim), Kenneth Sean Teo Hao Jin, Lea Woon Yee, Lee Eun Ngyung, Prof Kwon Young Joon, Rachel Low Tze-Lynn, Sunyoung Kim, Tan Jui Yang Benedict, Tan Yuan Kheng (Chen Yuanqing), Tang Xi-Rui, Charlotte, Toby Landau, Yoo Lim Oh, Zhuo Jiaxiang |
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 12, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (30)
Case Significance
CNA v CNB and another and other matters [2023] SGHC(I) 12 is a reserved judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court, delivered on 2 August 2023 by Simon Thorley IJ (delivering the judgment of the court) sitting with Philip Jeyaretnam J and Yuko Miyazaki IJ, in Originating Summonses Nos 2, 3, 4 and 5 of 2022. Following the Substantive Judgment in CNA v CNB and another and other matters [2023] SGHC(I) 6, in which the court found in favour of the defendants CNB and CNC, the parties were directed to seek agreement on an appropriate costs order but were unable to reach full agreement. The summonses, transferred to the SICC on 4 January 2022, concerned the award of costs in the arbitration-related proceedings, which the court determined on the parties' written submissions.
[2023] SGHC(I) 12 explained
CNA v CNB & Anor ([2023] SGHC(I) 12) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 2 August 2023. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC(I) 12 about?
CNA v CNB & Anor ([2023] SGHC(I) 12) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Costs — Awarded”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGHC(I) 12 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGHC(I) 6. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
This decision addressed costs across four related originating summonses in the Singapore International Commercial Court, after the court's substantive judgment had found in favour of the defendants (CNB and CNC). The parties agreed the plaintiffs should pay the defendants' costs in equal proportions but disputed quantum. The court assessed and ordered the plaintiffs to pay specified pre-transfer and post-transfer counsel fees and disbursements in Singapore dollars and Korean won.
What was CNA v CNB [2023] SGHC(I) 12 about?
It was the costs judgment following CNA v CNB [2023] SGHC(I) 6, in which the Singapore International Commercial Court found for defendants CNB and CNC. Delivered on 2 August 2023 by Simon Thorley IJ, it resolved costs across Originating Summonses 2 to 5 of 2022.
Which judges decided CNA v CNB [2023] SGHC(I) 12?
The Singapore International Commercial Court comprised Philip Jeyaretnam J, Simon Thorley IJ and Yuko Miyazaki IJ, with Simon Thorley IJ delivering the judgment of the court. The costs decision was delivered on 2 August 2023 in the arbitration-related originating summonses.
Cases Cited (6)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 12)