CARLOS MANUEL DE SÃO VICENTE v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Outcome
Application dismissed“I therefore dismiss the application.”
Source: [2023] SGHC 143, High Court (General Division), decided 17 May 2023. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Vincent Hoong |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, TSMP Law Corporation, Alan Loh, Daniel Ling, Eric Hu, Neo Zhi Wei Eugene, Phoon Wuei, Thio Shen Yi |
Source: [2023] SGHC 143, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Carlos Manuel De Sao Vicente v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 143 is a reserved judgment of Vincent Hoong J in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 17 May 2023 in Criminal Motion No 50 of 2022. The applicant, a man who at the peak of his wealth had amassed a fortune of more than a billion US dollars as the majority shareholder of a leading co-insurance firm in Angola's oil industry, had been convicted of tax offences and money laundering by the Angolan courts and described his prosecution as politically motivated. The motion concerns the police power to investigate under s 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010.
Summary
Carlos Manuel De São Vicente, an Angolan businessman convicted of tax offences and money laundering in Angola, applied under s 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the release of funds from his Bank of Singapore account, seized by the Commercial Affairs Department and holding more than USD558 million, to pay his legal expenses. The court held that release of the seized funds was unnecessary given assets available in Switzerland and Angola, and dismissed the application.
What was Carlos Manuel De Sao Vicente v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 143 about?
Vincent Hoong J heard a criminal motion by Carlos Manuel De Sao Vicente, a former billionaire and majority shareholder of an Angolan oil-industry co-insurance firm, concerning the police power to investigate under s 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010.
What legal question did Carlos Manuel De Sao Vicente v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 143 raise?
The motion raised the scope of the police power to investigate under s 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010, in the context of an applicant who had been convicted of tax offences and money laundering by the Angolan courts.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 143)