Proofpoint, Inc. v Maiwand Youssoftay
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Goh Yihan |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Fullerton Law Chambers LLC, Chan Yun Wen Charmaine, Ling Yuanrong, Siraj Omar, Tham Wei Chern, Wang Chunhua |
Source: [2023] SGHC 150, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
Proofpoint, Inc v Maiwand Youssoftay [2023] SGHC 150 is an ex tempore judgment of Goh Yihan JC in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 18 May 2023 in Originating Application No 288 of 2023. Proofpoint, Inc applied under ss 3 and 4 of the Evidence (Civil Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1979 for an order requiring the respondent, Maiwand Youssoftay, to produce documents in aid of foreign proceedings in the Superior Court of California. After hearing the parties, Goh Yihan JC dismissed the application.
[2023] SGHC 150 explained
Proofpoint, Inc. v Maiwand Youssoftay ([2023] SGHC 150) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 18 May 2023. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC 150 about?
Proofpoint, Inc. v Maiwand Youssoftay ([2023] SGHC 150) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Discovery of documents — Production of documents in aid of foreign proceedings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC 150 consider?
The judgment refers to Act comes from the Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
Proofpoint, Inc applied under sections 3 and 4 of the Evidence (Civil Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1979 for an order requiring Maiwand Youssoftay to produce documents in aid of proceedings in the Superior Court of California. The court dismissed the application, finding that it was not made pursuant to a valid "request" issued by a foreign court or tribunal as required by section 3(a), so the court lacked the statutory power to make the production order. Costs of $5,000 were awarded to the respondent.
What did the court decide in Proofpoint, Inc v Maiwand Youssoftay [2023] SGHC 150?
Goh Yihan JC dismissed Proofpoint, Inc's application under ss 3 and 4 of the Evidence (Civil Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1979, which sought an order requiring Maiwand Youssoftay to produce documents in aid of proceedings in the Superior Court of California.
What was the purpose of the application in Proofpoint, Inc v Maiwand Youssoftay [2023] SGHC 150?
Proofpoint, Inc sought the production of documents from the respondent in aid of foreign civil proceedings before the Superior Court of California, invoking the Singapore court's powers under the Evidence (Civil Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1979.
Statutes Cited
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 150)