THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v RAVI S/O MADASAMY

[2023] SGHC 65 High Court (General Division) 21 March 2023 C3J/OS 2/2022
29 cases cited (28 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judges Belinda Ang, Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang
Charges / claim Legal Profession
Counsel WongPartnership LLP, Lin Weiqi Wendy, Teo Guo Zheng, Titus

Source: [2023] SGHC 65, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (3)

WongPartnership LLP Firm Lin Weiqi Wendy Counsel for the applicant
Teo Guo Zheng, Titus Counsel for the applicant

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2023] SGHC 65 was heard by the Court of Three Judges — Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Belinda Ang JCA — on Originating Summons No 2 of 2022, with judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ on 21 March 2023. The Law Society applied for the respondent, Mr Ravi s/o Madasamy, an advocate and solicitor of 20 years' standing then practising with Carson Law Chambers, to be sanctioned under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966. The misconduct in issue arose from comments Mr Ravi made in an interview with The Online Citizen Asia and later posts on Facebook following the release of the Court of Appeal's oral grounds in Gobi a/l Avedian v Public Prosecutor on 19 October 2020; a disciplinary tribunal had investigated four primary and three alternative charges, and the excerpt sets out the issues rather than the final sanction.

What was Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2023] SGHC 65 about?

The Law Society applied to the Court of Three Judges under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966 to sanction advocate Ravi s/o Madasamy for comments to The Online Citizen Asia and on Facebook after the Gobi a/l Avedian oral grounds were released on 19 October 2020.

Which judges heard the disciplinary case against Ravi s/o Madasamy ([2023] SGHC 65)?

The Court of Three Judges comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Belinda Ang JCA heard Originating Summons No 2 of 2022, with Sundaresh Menon CJ delivering the judgment of the court on 21 March 2023.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (29)

SG (5)
[2007] SGDC 10 [2015] SGHC 126 [2017] SGHC 145 [2022] SGHC 180 [2022] SGHC 185
SLR (23)
[1992] 2 SLR(R) 969 [1992] 3 SLR(R) 825 [1998] 2 SLR(R) 905 [1999] 1 SLR(R) 266 [1999] 3 SLR(R) 559 [2003] 3 SLR(R) 209 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 300 [2008] 2 SLR(R) 239 [2009] 2 SLR(R) 1132 [2010] 3 SLR 390 [2011] 3 SLR 778 [2012] 1 SLR 348 [2013] 4 SLR 91 [2016] 5 SLR 1141 [2017] 4 SLR 1369 [2017] 5 SLR 746 [2019] 1 SLR 113 [2019] 2 SLR 254 [2020] 2 SLR 883 [2021] 1 SLR 180 [2022] 3 SLR 1386 [2022] 3 SLR 777 [2022] 4 SLR 467
MY (1)
[1988] 3 MLJ 425

Cited By (2)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 65)