THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v RAVI S/O MADASAMY
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Belinda Ang, Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang |
| Charges / claim | Legal Profession |
| Counsel | WongPartnership LLP, Lin Weiqi Wendy, Teo Guo Zheng, Titus |
Source: [2023] SGHC 65, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2023] SGHC 65 was heard by the Court of Three Judges — Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Belinda Ang JCA — on Originating Summons No 2 of 2022, with judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ on 21 March 2023. The Law Society applied for the respondent, Mr Ravi s/o Madasamy, an advocate and solicitor of 20 years' standing then practising with Carson Law Chambers, to be sanctioned under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966. The misconduct in issue arose from comments Mr Ravi made in an interview with The Online Citizen Asia and later posts on Facebook following the release of the Court of Appeal's oral grounds in Gobi a/l Avedian v Public Prosecutor on 19 October 2020; a disciplinary tribunal had investigated four primary and three alternative charges, and the excerpt sets out the issues rather than the final sanction.
What was Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2023] SGHC 65 about?
The Law Society applied to the Court of Three Judges under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966 to sanction advocate Ravi s/o Madasamy for comments to The Online Citizen Asia and on Facebook after the Gobi a/l Avedian oral grounds were released on 19 October 2020.
Which judges heard the disciplinary case against Ravi s/o Madasamy ([2023] SGHC 65)?
The Court of Three Judges comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Belinda Ang JCA heard Originating Summons No 2 of 2022, with Sundaresh Menon CJ delivering the judgment of the court on 21 March 2023.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (29)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 65)