RAFFLES EDUCATION CORPORATION LIMITED & 2 Ors v SHANTANU PRAKASH & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Audrey Lim |
| Charges / claim | Tort |
| Counsel | KSCGP Juris LLP, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, WongPartnership LLP, Bernice Tan, Chong Wan Yee Monica, Ho Yi Jie, Kelvin Poon, Lim Yun Heng, Lin Weiqi Wendy, P Padman, Tai Mun Chien, Tng Sheng Rong |
Source: [2023] SGHC 89, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Case Significance
Raffles Education Corp Ltd and others v Shantanu Prakash and another [2023] SGHC 89 was heard by Audrey Lim J in the General Division of the High Court (Suit No 709 of 2019), with judgment reserved on 6 April 2023. The plaintiffs were Raffles Education Corporation Limited, a Singapore private-education company chaired by Mr Chew Hua Seng, together with its subsidiaries Raffles Education Investment (India) Pte Ltd and Raffles Design International India Pvt Ltd, referred to collectively as the Raffles Education Group. They sued Mr Shantanu Prakash, founder of the Educomp group of companies, and Mr Lui Yew Lee Dennis Paul, advancing claims in the torts of conspiracy, inducement of breach of contract, and fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation.
[2023] SGHC 89 explained
RAFFLES EDUCATION CORPORATION LIMITED & 2 Ors v SHANTANU PRAKASH & Anor ([2023] SGHC 89) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 April 2023. It is categorised under Tort. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC 89 about?
RAFFLES EDUCATION CORPORATION LIMITED & 2 Ors v SHANTANU PRAKASH & Anor ([2023] SGHC 89) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Tort — Conspiracy”, “Tort — Inducement of breach of contract”, “Tort — Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit”, and “Tort — Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
How influential is [2023] SGHC 89?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC 89 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
The Raffles Education Group companies sued Mr Shantanu Prakash, founder of the Educomp group, and a lawyer, Mr Dennis Lui, alleging conspiracy, inducement of breach of contract, and fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation over a Share Purchase Agreement and a Business Advisory Agreement. The High Court found the plaintiffs had proved fraudulent misrepresentation on the Business Advisory Agreement, inducing breaches of both agreements, and conspiracy. The two defendants were held jointly and severally liable to pay $221,080 and INR163.2m, with interest, subject to the bar against double recovery.
Who were the parties in Raffles Education Corp Ltd v Shantanu Prakash [2023] SGHC 89?
The plaintiffs were Raffles Education Corporation Limited, chaired by Mr Chew Hua Seng, and its subsidiaries Raffles Education Investment (India) Pte Ltd and Raffles Design International India Pvt Ltd. The defendants were Mr Shantanu Prakash, founder of the Educomp group, and Mr Lui Yew Lee Dennis Paul.
What claims were brought in Suit No 709 of 2019 ([2023] SGHC 89)?
In [2023] SGHC 89, the Raffles Education Group advanced claims in the torts of conspiracy, inducement of breach of contract, and misrepresentation, covering both fraud and deceit and negligent misrepresentation, in proceedings before Audrey Lim J with judgment reserved on 6 April 2023.
Cases Cited (27)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 89)