WJM v WJN
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Accord Law Chambers, Bhaskaran Shamkumar |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 18, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (2)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WJM v WJN [2023] SGHCF 18 was heard in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) by Choo Han Teck J, with judgment reserved and delivered on 3 April 2023 in District Court Appeal No 109 of 2022. The appellant Wife appealed against the ancillary orders of District Judge Goh Zhuo Neng in FC/ORC 5473/2022, made on 22 November 2022, concerning the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance payable by the Wife to the Husband. The 22-year marriage ran from 11 April 1998 to interim judgment on 27 April 2021; the Husband is 67 and the Wife 49. Applying ANJ v ANK [2015] 4 SLR 1043, the DJ set direct contributions at 36.1%:63.9% and indirect at 45%:55%, yielding an overall division of 40.55% (Husband):59.45% (Wife).
Summary
This appeal in the High Court (Family Division) concerned a wife's challenge to a District Judge's ancillary orders on the division of matrimonial assets and on maintenance payable by her to the husband, following a marriage of about 22 years. The wife disputed the computation of direct and indirect contributions, including the treatment of a housing grant and the husband's CPF contributions, while the husband, who is wheelchair-bound and certified disabled, sought lifelong maintenance. The court found the maintenance order fair and reasonable and dismissed the wife's appeal.
What was appealed in WJM v WJN [2023] SGHCF 18?
The Wife appealed against District Judge Goh Zhuo Neng's ancillary orders of 22 November 2022 in FC/ORC 5473/2022, concerning division of matrimonial assets and maintenance payable by the Wife to the Husband. The 22-year marriage ran from 11 April 1998 to interim judgment on 27 April 2021.
How were matrimonial assets divided in WJM v WJN ([2023] SGHCF 18)?
Applying ANJ v ANK [2015] 4 SLR 1043, the District Judge found direct financial contributions of 36.1% (Husband) to 63.9% (Wife) and indirect contributions of 45% to 55%, and, weighting both equally, ordered an overall division of 40.55% (Husband) to 59.45% (Wife).
Cases Cited (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 18)