WHB v WHA
Outcome
Appeal dismissed“The appeal is therefore dismissed, but I will make no order as to costs.”
Source: [2023] SGHCF 20, High Court (Family Division), decided 11 April 2023. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | ARShanker Law Chambers, A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 20, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WHB v WHA [2023] SGHCF 20 was heard by Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) on District Court Appeal No 86 of 2022, with hearings on 22 February and 10 March 2023 and judgment reserved on 11 April 2023. The appellant Wife and respondent Husband, both originally from Bangalore, India, married on 25 June 1995; the Husband, now 55, is a molecular biologist working in Singapore who had gone to America for his Ph.D., while the Wife, now 53, works in Singapore as a secretary and has been a Singapore citizen since 2005. The appeal concerned the division of matrimonial assets, against a background in which the Wife alleged physical and mental abuse during the marriage.
Summary
The wife appealed against a District Judge's decision on the division of matrimonial assets in a marriage between two individuals originally from Bangalore, India, involving an HDB flat and a condominium. The disputes included the indirect-contribution ratio and the return of jewellery. The court affirmed the 80:20 indirect-contribution ratio in the husband's favour and let the jewellery order stand, dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.
What was WHB v WHA [2023] SGHCF 20 about?
It was District Court Appeal No 86 of 2022 before Choo Han Teck J concerning the division of matrimonial assets between a Wife and Husband, both originally from Bangalore, India, who married on 25 June 1995. Judgment was reserved on 11 April 2023.
Who were the parties in WHB v WHA ([2023] SGHCF 20)?
The appellant Wife, now 53, works in Singapore as a secretary and has been a citizen since 2005. The respondent Husband, now 55, is a molecular biologist in Singapore who earlier obtained his Ph.D. in America. They married on 25 June 1995.
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 20)