WKN v WKM
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Crossbows LLP, Winchester Law LLC, Anuradha d/o Krishan Chand Sharma, Gulab Sobhraj, Low Wan Kwong Michael |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 25, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WKN v WKM [2023] SGHCF 25 is the grounds of decision of Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 15 May 2023 in District Court Appeal No 2 of 2023. The appellant Mother and respondent Father married on 12 February 2012 and have a daughter, then 11 years old; under ancillary orders made final on 17 March 2017 they held joint custody, with care and control residing with the Father and liberal access to the Mother. From 9 November 2021 the Child began residing with the Mother, who alleged emotional abuse and neglect by the Father, prompting cross-applications on custody, care and control and access.
[2023] SGHCF 25 explained
WKN v WKM ([2023] SGHCF 25) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 15 May 2023. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHCF 25 about?
WKN v WKM ([2023] SGHCF 25) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Custody — Access” and “Family Law — Custody — Care and control”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
How influential is [2023] SGHCF 25?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 25 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
The mother appealed against a District Judge's decision dismissing her application to vary ancillary orders and enforcing the father's care and control of their daughter, with the mother's access reduced to supervised access. After hearing submissions and interviewing the child, the court found it was in the child's interests to live with the mother. The appeal was allowed, care and control was transferred to the mother, and the father was granted liberal access, with no order as to costs.
What was WKN v WKM [2023] SGHCF 25 about?
Choo Han Teck J heard District Court Appeal No 2 of 2023 concerning custody, care and control, and access to a daughter aged 11. Care and control had resided with the Father before the Child moved to the Mother in November 2021. Delivered 15 May 2023.
Why did the custody arrangements change in [2023] SGHCF 25?
From 9 November 2021, the Child began residing with the Mother because she alleged emotional abuse and neglect of the Child by the Father and his domestic helper. This change was made without a court order, prompting cross-applications by both parents.
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 25)