WOS v WOT

[2023] SGHCF 36 High Court (Family Division) 31 July 2023 HCF/DT 4601/2018

15 cases cited Cited by 12 cases

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	31 July 2023
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Family Law
Counsel	PDLegal LLC, PKWA Law Practice LLC, Lee Weiming Andrew, Ling Vey Hong, Nah Xiang Ling Charlene, Tan Xuan Qi Dorothy

Source: [2023] SGHCF 36, High Court (Family Division), decided 31 July 2023 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Maintenance — Child – Tertiary education overseas Family Law — Maintenance — Wife – Assets received from division sufficient to provide for Wife Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division – Operative date for determining matrimonial assets – Husband leaving matrimonial home not a conclusive factor pointing to the end of marriage contract which justifies an earlier operative date

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (6)

PDLegal LLC Firm PKWA Law Practice LLC Firm Lee Weiming Andrew Counsel for the plaintiff

Ling Vey Hong Counsel for the plaintiff

Nah Xiang Ling Charlene Counsel for the defendant

Tan Xuan Qi Dorothy Counsel for the defendant

Parties (2)

WOS Plaintiff

WOT Defendant

Case Significance

WOS v WOT [2023] SGHCF 36 is a reserved judgment of Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 31 July 2023 in Divorce Transferred No 4601 of 2018. The plaintiff Husband, a 65-year-old businessman in the construction and maintenance industry, and the defendant Wife, a 60-year-old housewife, were married for 20 years from 3 June 1999 and have a 21-year-old son, E, who is in university overseas; the parties had lived separately since the end of 2010 and interim judgment of divorce was granted on 12 March 2019. The remaining ancillary issues concerned the division of matrimonial assets, including the operative date for determining those assets, and the maintenance for the Wife and E, including his overseas tertiary education.

Summary

This divorce concerned the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance after a 20-year marriage between a businessman and a housewife. A key dispute was whether the operative date for valuing assets was the interim judgment date or the earlier separation date, which affected the pool's value significantly. Choo Han Teck J addressed the operative date and maintenance for the wife and their son, noting the wife would receive over $8 million as her share, declined to decide her unpaid-maintenance complaint in these proceedings, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

What issues did WOS v WOT [2023] SGHCF 36 decide?

Choo Han Teck J addressed the division of matrimonial assets, including the operative date for determining those assets, and the maintenance of the Wife and the parties' 21-year-old son E for his overseas tertiary education. The judgment was delivered on 31 July 2023.

What were the family circumstances in WOS v WOT [2023] SGHCF 36?

The 65-year-old Husband and 60-year-old Wife were married for 20 years from 3 June 1999, had lived separately since the end of 2010, and obtained interim judgment of divorce on 12 March 2019. They have a 21-year-old son, E, studying at university overseas.

Cases Cited (15)

SG (5)

[2020] SGCA 8 [2021] SGHCF 12 [2022] SGHCF 23 [2022] SGHCF 7 [2023] SGHCF 9

SLR (10)

[2011] 2 SLR 1157 [2014] 1 SLR 629 [2015] 2 SLR 195 [2015] 4 SLR 1043 [2016] 2 SLR 686 [2016] 3 SLR 1137 [2016] 4 SLR 674 [2017] 1 SLR 609 [2021] 3 SLR 1145 [2022] 2 SLR 1043