VMG v VMH
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Legal Aid Bureau, Darren Chan Eng Jin, Joanne Ho, Victor Lim See Wai |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 45, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
VMG v VMH [2023] SGHCF 45 is a grounds of decision of Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 25 October 2023 in District Court Appeal No 46 of 2023. It was the father's appeal against a District Judge's decision dismissing his application to vary the access arrangements for his son, over whom both parents have joint custody and the mother has care and control. Under the arrangements first made in 2021, the father was given 10 hours of access each week plus additional hours on public holidays, his birthday and the Tamil New Year, and in this appeal he sought expanded access including overnight weekend access and weekly school-holiday access.
[2023] SGHCF 45 explained
VMG v VMH ([2023] SGHCF 45) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 25 October 2023. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHCF 45 about?
VMG v VMH ([2023] SGHCF 45) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Custody — Access — Increase in the access time for the father”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
How influential is [2023] SGHCF 45?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 45 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
This was an appeal by a father against a district judge's dismissal of his application to vary access arrangements for his six-year-old son, of whom the mother had care and control. The father sought expanded access, including overnight and additional school-holiday time, to spend more time with the child. The court increased the father's Saturday and Sunday access and granted additional access during the December holidays until a review date of 1 June 2024, and admitted a psychological report of the child for completeness, with no order as to costs.
What was VMG v VMH [2023] SGHCF 45 about?
It was the father's appeal before Choo Han Teck J against a District Judge's dismissal of his application to vary access to his son, decided in the Family Division of the High Court on 25 October 2023.
What access did the father seek in [2023] SGHCF 45?
The father, who had 10 hours of access each week plus holiday hours under arrangements first made in 2021, sought expanded access including overnight weekend access from Saturday to Sunday and weekly school-holiday access from Wednesday to Sunday.
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 45)