Lim Wei Fong, Nicman v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

[2024] SGCA 33 Court of Appeal 26 August 2024 • CA/CCA 1/2024 • 40 min read
19 cases cited (17 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

we dismissed the appeal.

Source: [2024] SGCA 33, Court of Appeal, decided 26 August 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court Court of Appeal
Decided
Judges Belinda Ang Saw Ean, See Kee Oon, Tay Yong Kwang
Charges / claim Criminal Law
Outcome Appeal dismissed
Counsel Attorney-General's Chambers, Prolegis LLC, Benedict Chan, Brian Tan, Chong Yong, Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen, Samyata Ravindran

Source: [2024] SGCA 33, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (7)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Lim Wei Fong Nicman v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 33 was decided by the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore in Criminal Appeal No 1 of 2024, with See Kee Oon JAD delivering the grounds of decision of the court, sitting with Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA. The appeal was heard on 6 May 2024 and the grounds were issued on 26 August 2024. It was the appellant's appeal against his conviction on one charge under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) and punishable under s 33(1) of the MDA, for having in his possession four packets containing not less than 367.2 g of methamphetamine for the purpose of trafficking. The trial judge had imposed a sentence of life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane, with the grounds of decision set out in Public Prosecutor v Lim Wei Fong Nicman [2024] SGHC 3.

As recorded in the judgment, on 11 August 2020 at about 10.05pm a party of officers from the Central Narcotics Bureau arrested the appellant in a car bearing licence plate SMP7468Y at the junction of Jalan Besar and Petain Road; the appellant, a Singaporean male, was then 26 years old. The catchwords identify the issues as the general exception of duress and statutory offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act, and the matter also engaged the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code. The court dismissed the appeal on 6 May 2024. The appellant was represented by counsel from Prolegis LLC, including Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen and Samyata Ravindran, while the Attorney-General's Chambers acted for the respondent.

Summary

This was an appeal against the appellant's conviction on a charge of possessing not less than 367.2g of methamphetamine for the purpose of trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, for which the trial judge had imposed life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. The appellant raised a defence of duress, arguing among other things that he did not subjectively know that those instructing him would resort to threats of death. The Court of Appeal rejected the duress defence, noting that the relevant statutory provision did not require such subjective knowledge, and dismissed the appeal.

What did the Court of Appeal decide in Lim Wei Fong Nicman v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 33?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal against his conviction for possessing not less than 367.2 g of methamphetamine for trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The trial judge had imposed life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane; grounds were issued on 26 August 2024.

What were the circumstances of the arrest in Lim Wei Fong Nicman v Public Prosecutor ([2024] SGCA 33)?

On 11 August 2020 at about 10.05pm, Central Narcotics Bureau officers arrested the appellant, then a 26-year-old Singaporean male, in a car bearing licence plate SMP7468Y at the junction of Jalan Besar and Petain Road, leading to a charge under the Misuse of Drugs Act.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (19)

SG (6)
[1995] SGHC 213 [1997] SGCA 57 [2009] SGHC 230 [2015] SGHC 199 [2015] SGHC 73 [2024] SGHC 3
SLR (11)
[1994] 3 SLR(R) 375 [1995] 1 SLR 274 [1995] 3 SLR(R) 776 [1996] 1 SLR 246 [1999] 1 SLR(R) 442 [1999] 2 SLR 57 [2000] 2 SLR(R) 351 [2011] 2 SLR 830 [2014] 2 SLR 393 [2019] 1 SLR 440 [2021] 2 SLR 847
MY (2)
[1949] MLJ 87 [1956] MLJ 220

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA 33)