Arbiters Inc Law Corporation v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph & Anor

[2024] SGHC 26 High Court (General Division) 31 January 2024 • HC/OA 1008/2023 • 17 min read
2 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Arbiters Inc Law Corporation, Tan Kok Quan Partnership, Jasleen Kaur, Nayo Leong, Paul Seah Zhen Wei, Vijay Kumar Rai

Source: [2024] SGHC 26, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Arbiters Inc Law Corporation v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph & Anor [2024] SGHC 26 was decided in the General Division of the High Court (Originating Application No 1008 of 2023) by Choo Han Teck J, with judgment delivered on 31 January 2024 after a hearing on 11 January 2024. The matter arose under Order 6 of the Rules of Court 2021 and Section 113 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161). The applicant, a law corporation, sued the respondents Arokiasamy Steven Joseph and Tan Kin Tee for payment of legal fees. The respondents had been the first and second plaintiffs in Suit 833 of 2020.

Summary

In this General Division of the High Court matter, the applicant, a law corporation, sought payment of its legal fees from the respondents, a husband and wife who had been plaintiffs in an earlier suit against two doctors and the Institute of Mental Health concerning their son's death. The matter raised issues of costs and taxation, including the reasonableness of disbursements such as the fees of an expert witness. The court assessed the expert's contribution and awarded $9,000 for her fees, and, because the award was far less than what the applicant claimed and the applicant had declined to have its bill taxed, ordered the applicant to pay the plaintiffs costs of $2,000 each.

What was Arbiters Inc Law Corporation v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph [2024] SGHC 26 about?

Decided by Choo Han Teck J on 31 January 2024, the case was a law corporation's claim for payment of its legal fees against Arokiasamy Steven Joseph and Tan Kin Tee, who had earlier been plaintiffs in Suit 833 of 2020, brought under Section 113 of the Legal Profession Act.

Which court and judge decided [2024] SGHC 26?

The matter was heard in the General Division of the High Court of Singapore as Originating Application No 1008 of 2023, decided by Choo Han Teck J. The hearing took place on 11 January 2024 and judgment was reserved and delivered on 31 January 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (2)

SG (2)
[2023] SGHC 230 [2023] SGHC 291

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 26)