TIMOTHY JAMES REID & Anor

Q: Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 60 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2024] SGHC 60 High Court (General Division) 8 March 2024 HC/OA 1296/2023 5 min read

1 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	8 March 2024
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure, Insolvency Law
Counsel	Drew & Napier LLC, Andrew Chua Ruiming, Ng Jun De Andrew

Source: [2024] SGHC 60, High Court (General Division), decided 8 March 2024 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Inherent powers Insolvency Law — Winding up — Liquidator — Whether liquidator may be given leave to appoint solicitor

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (3)

Drew & Napier LLC Firm Andrew Chua Ruiming Counsel Applicant Ng Jun De Andrew Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

Ng Yau Yee Theresa Applicant Timothy James Reid Applicant

Case Significance

Re Eye-Biz Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) [2024] SGHC 60 was decided by the General Division of the High Court on 8 March 2024, with Choo Han Teck J delivering the grounds of decision after a hearing on 27 February 2024 in Originating Application No 1296 of 2023, brought under section 144(1)(f) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. The applicants, Timothy James Reid and Ng Yau Yee Theresa, were the joint and several liquidators of Eye-Biz Pte Ltd, a supplier of optical products that was wound up on 23 May 2023 on the application of its creditor, Johnson and Johnson Pte Ltd. The liquidators believed the company might have claims against its former directors and other persons that, if successful, could enlarge the company's assets to pay off creditors. The application sought the court's leave for the liquidators to appoint Drew & Napier LLC as solicitors for the purpose of bringing and defending legal proceedings in the name and on behalf of the company, the liquidators having written to creditors with no objections received. The matter also raised the court's inherent powers.

[2024] SGHC 60 explained

TIMOTHY JAMES REID & Anor ([2024] SGHC 60) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 8 March 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 60 about?

TIMOTHY JAMES REID & Anor ([2024] SGHC 60) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Inherent powers” and “Insolvency Law — Winding up — Liquidator — Whether liquidator may be given leave to appoint solicitor”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 60 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGHC 60?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 60 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

The joint and several liquidators of Eye-Biz Pte Ltd, a wound-up supplier of optical products, applied under s 144(1)(f) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 for leave to appoint Drew & Napier LLC as solicitors to bring and defend proceedings in the company's name, having identified possible claims against former directors. The court addressed whether a liquidator may be given leave to appoint a solicitor and from what date such an appointment may take effect, observing that the court's discretion and inherent powers allow it to specify the effective date. The court granted leave to appoint the firm, with the appointment to take effect from 28 December 2023, and made no order as to costs.

What was the application in Re Eye-Biz Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 60 about?

The joint liquidators of Eye-Biz Pte Ltd, Timothy James Reid and Ng Yau Yee Theresa, sought the High Court's leave under section 144(1)(f) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 to appoint Drew & Napier LLC as solicitors to bring and defend legal proceedings on behalf of the wound-up company.

Why was Eye-Biz Pte Ltd in liquidation in [2024] SGHC 60?

Eye-Biz Pte Ltd, a supplier of optical products, was wound up on 23 May 2023 on the application of its creditor Johnson and Johnson Pte Ltd. The liquidators believed the company might have claims against its former directors that could enlarge its assets to pay off creditors.