LIM ING HAAN (LIN YINGHONG) v TUAN 'ABDU QAYYIM BIN TUAN ISA
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | See Kee Oon |
| Charges / claim | Damages |
Source: [2024] SGHC 86, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Lim Ing Haan v Tuan 'Abdu Qayyim bin Tuan Isa [2024] SGHC 86 is a reserved judgment of the General Division of the High Court (Suit No 383 of 2020), heard across September and December 2023 and delivered by See Kee Oon JAD on 26 March 2024. The plaintiff, Lim Ing Haan, was an interventional cardiologist consultant and director of Lim Ing Haan Cardiology Pte Ltd. She brought an action against the defendant, Tuan 'Abdu Qayyim bin Tuan Isa, seeking damages for injuries to her right wrist arising from a traffic accident. The judgment records that, at about 6pm on 4 May 2017, the defendant attempted a right turn from the second lane of Bukit Timah Road and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The central dispute concerned the quantification of the plaintiff's loss of future earnings consequent upon an anticipated future surgery in respect of the injuries. The catchwords identify the issue as the assessment of damages for loss of future earnings.
[2024] SGHC 86 explained
LIM ING HAAN (LIN YINGHONG) v TUAN 'ABDU QAYYIM BIN TUAN ISA ([2024] SGHC 86) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 26 March 2024. It is categorised under Damages. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 86 about?
LIM ING HAAN (LIN YINGHONG) v TUAN 'ABDU QAYYIM BIN TUAN ISA ([2024] SGHC 86) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Damages - Assessment - Loss of future earnings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
The plaintiff, an interventional cardiologist, brought an action in the General Division of the High Court against the defendant seeking damages for injuries to her right wrist caused by a traffic accident, with interlocutory judgment having been entered against the defendant at 100% liability and the central dispute concerning the quantification of her loss of future earnings consequent upon an anticipated future surgery. The medical experts agreed that the plaintiff relied on her right wrist for precise surgical procedures and that any partial or total wrist fusion would limit her range of motion, with a real possibility of retirement as an interventional cardiologist after surgery. The provided excerpt sets out the agreed medical positions on the effect of the anticipated surgery but does not state the court's final quantification or disposition.
What was Lim Ing Haan v Tuan 'Abdu Qayyim bin Tuan Isa [2024] SGHC 86 about?
Decided by See Kee Oon JAD on 26 March 2024, it concerned a claim by interventional cardiologist Lim Ing Haan for damages for right-wrist injuries from a traffic accident on Bukit Timah Road on 4 May 2017. The central dispute was the assessment of her loss of future earnings arising from anticipated future surgery.
What was the central issue in the assessment of damages in [2024] SGHC 86?
The central dispute before See Kee Oon JAD was the quantification of the plaintiff's loss of future earnings consequent upon an anticipated future surgery, given that as an interventional cardiologist Lim Ing Haan performed complex procedures requiring precise use of her right wrist.
Cases Cited (4)
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Damages awarded in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 86)