UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.

[2025] SGDC 331 District Court 30 December 2025 • DC/OC 1487/2023 • 28 min read
3 cases cited

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

[2025] SGDC 331 is a District Court decision dated 30 December 2025 concerning Tort, specifically addressing negligence. The judgment was delivered by Sia Aik Kor. The case was brought by Uddin Mohammad Zosim (plaintiff) against CES Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd. (defendant). Legal representation was provided by C Ramesh Law Practice and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases.

Summary

A construction worker sued his employer for negligence and breach of workplace safety duties after he was allegedly flung two metres when a rebar broke while he was using a rebar bender at a worksite. The key issues were whether the employer breached its duty of care and statutory duties under the Workplace Safety and Health Act. The District Court dismissed the claim, finding the claimant was an experienced worker with seven years of rebar-bending experience who did not require supervision, and there was no evidence the rebar bender was defective.

What was decided in [2025] SGDC 331?

[2025] SGDC 331 (UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.) is a District Court decision from 30 December 2025 addressing Tort, specifically negligence. The judgment was delivered by Sia Aik Kor.

Who were the parties in UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGDC 331 was Uddin Mohammad Zosim, and the defendant was CES Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included C Ramesh Law Practice and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The case was decided on 30 December 2025 in the District Court.

Which judge decided [2025] SGDC 331?

[2025] SGDC 331 was delivered by Sia Aik Kor in the District Court on 30 December 2025. The case concerned Tort.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGDC 331 cite?

[2025] SGDC 331 cites 3 prior decisions.

Cases Cited (3)

SG (2)
[2008] SGHC 148 [2014] SGHC 177
SLR (1)
[1999] 3 SLR(R) 377

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGDC 331)