UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.

[2025] SGDC 331 District Court 30 December 2025 DC/OC 1487/2023 28 min read

3 cases cited

Key facts

Court	District Court
Decided	30 December 2025
Judge	Sia Aik Kor
Charges / claim	Tort
Counsel	C Ramesh Law Practice, PKWA Law Practice LLC, Regency Legal LLP, Charles Phua, Mahendran s/o Mylvaganam, Ram Chandra Ramesh

Source: [2025] SGDC 331, District Court, decided 30 December 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Tort — Negligence — Breach of Duty

Practice Areas

Tort

Judges (1)

Sia Aik Kor Delivered

Counsel (6)

C Ramesh Law Practice Firm PKWA Law Practice LLC Firm Regency Legal LLP Firm Charles Phua Counsel Defendant Mahendran s/o Mylvaganam Counsel Plaintiff Ram Chandra Ramesh Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

CES Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd. Defendant Uddin Mohammad Zosim Plaintiff

Case Significance

[2025] SGDC 331 is a District Court decision dated 30 December 2025 concerning Tort, specifically addressing negligence. The judgment was delivered by Sia Aik Kor. The case was brought by Uddin Mohammad Zosim (plaintiff) against CES Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd. (defendant). Legal representation was provided by C Ramesh Law Practice and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases.

[2025] SGDC 331 explained

UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD. ([2025] SGDC 331) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 30 December 2025. It is categorised under Tort. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGDC 331 about?

UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD. ([2025] SGDC 331) is a District Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Tort — Negligence — Breach of Duty”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Summary

A construction worker sued his employer for negligence and breach of workplace safety duties after he was allegedly flung two metres when a rebar broke while he was using a rebar bender at a worksite. The key issues were whether the employer breached its duty of care and statutory duties under the Workplace Safety and Health Act. The District Court dismissed the claim, finding the claimant was an experienced worker with seven years of rebar-bending experience who did not require supervision, and there was no evidence the rebar bender was defective.

What was decided in [2025] SGDC 331?

[2025] SGDC 331 (UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.) is a District Court decision from 30 December 2025 addressing Tort, specifically negligence. The judgment was delivered by Sia Aik Kor.

Who were the parties in UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD. ([2025] SGDC 331)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGDC 331 was Uddin Mohammad Zosim, and the defendant was CES Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included C Ramesh Law Practice and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The case was decided on 30 December 2025 in the District Court.