XTW v XTX
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 119 is a Family Court decision dated 3 November 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Phang Hsiao Chung. The case was brought by XTW (applicant) against XTX (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Adel Law LLC and Malcus Poh Law Corporation. The judgment cites 1 case and references 2 statutory provisions, including the FJRA were the Family Justice Reform Act and the Family Justice Reform Act.
Summary
A father applied to vary a 2013 consent order reducing his child maintenance from $500 to $200 per month, while the mother sought enforcement of maintenance arrears accumulated since February 2014. The father argued his income had decreased since the consent order, while the mother claimed he had not paid any maintenance for over a decade. The court allowed the variation reducing maintenance to $200 per month prospectively, and ordered the father to pay $18,000 in accumulated arrears in 36 monthly instalments of $500.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 119?
[2025] SGFC 119 (XTW v XTX) is a Family Court decision from 3 November 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Phang Hsiao Chung.
Who were the parties in XTW v XTX?
The applicant in [2025] SGFC 119 was XTW, and the respondent was XTX. Legal representation included Adel Law LLC and Malcus Poh Law Corporation. The case was decided on 3 November 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 119?
[2025] SGFC 119 was delivered by Phang Hsiao Chung in the Family Court on 3 November 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 119 cite?
[2025] SGFC 119 cites 1 prior decision. It references FJRA were the Family Justice Reform Act, Family Justice Reform Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 119)