XVX v XVY
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Sheik Mustafa bin Abu Hassan |
| Charges / claim | Family law, Access to child, Therapeutic justice, Shared care and control, Guardianship of Infants Act, Custody care and control of child |
| Counsel | IRB Law LLP, Muzammil & Co., Mohamed Muzammil bin Mohamed, Mohd Dzuleqhmal bin Mohd Dzulqhram |
Source: [2025] SGFC 132, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 132 is a Family Court decision dated 11 December 2025 concerning Access to child, Custody care and control of child, Family law, Guardianship of Infants Act, Shared care and control, and Therapeutic justice. The judgment was delivered by Sheik Mustafa bin Abu Hassan. The case was brought by XVX (applicant) against XVY (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Muzammil & Co. and IRB Law LLP. The judgment cites 7 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Guardianship of Infants Act.
[2025] SGFC 132 explained
XVX v XVY ([2025] SGFC 132) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 11 December 2025. It is categorised under Family law, Access to child, Therapeutic justice, Shared care and control, Guardianship of Infants Act, and Custody care and control of child. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGFC 132 about?
XVX v XVY ([2025] SGFC 132) is a Family Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family law”, “Access to child”, “Therapeutic justice”, and “Shared care and control”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGFC 132 consider?
The judgment refers to Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 122). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
Unmarried Muslim parents of a 5-month-old child contested custody, care and control following their separation, with the mother alleging the father had pressured her to sign away custody rights and prevented her from seeing the child. A custody evaluation was conducted and both parents were assessed as capable caregivers. The court ordered shared care and control with the child spending half of each week with each parent, applying therapeutic justice principles and ordering both parents to attend counselling to improve their co-parenting.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 132?
[2025] SGFC 132 (XVX v XVY) is a Family Court decision from 11 December 2025 addressing Access to child, Custody care and control of child, Family law, Guardianship of Infants Act, Shared care and control, and Therapeutic justice. The judgment was delivered by Sheik Mustafa bin Abu Hassan.
Who were the parties in XVX v XVY ([2025] SGFC 132)?
The applicant in [2025] SGFC 132 was XVX, and the respondent was XVY. Legal representation included IRB Law LLP and Muzammil & Co.. The case was decided on 11 December 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 132?
[2025] SGFC 132 was delivered by Sheik Mustafa bin Abu Hassan in the Family Court on 11 December 2025. The case concerned Access to child, Custody care and control of child, Family law, Guardianship of Infants Act, Shared care and control, and Therapeutic justice.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 132 cite?
[2025] SGFC 132 cites 7 prior decisions. It references Guardianship of Infants Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (7)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 132)