TPL v TPM
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 97 is a Family Court decision dated 21 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing jurisdiction. The judgment was delivered by Khoo May Ann. The case was brought by TPL (plaintiff) against TPM (defendant). Legal representation was provided by I.R.B. Law LLP. The judgment cites 7 cases (6 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Family Justice Act and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act.
Summary
A post-divorce case where the father filed approximately 10 applications in response to the mother's application to vary property and child maintenance orders. The court dismissed the father's applications for an injunction restraining disclosure of documents and to compel further compliance with discovery orders, awarding costs of $3,000 to the mother.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 97?
[2025] SGFC 97 (TPL v TPM) is a Family Court decision from 21 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically jurisdiction. The judgment was delivered by Khoo May Ann.
Who were the parties in TPL v TPM?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGFC 97 was TPL, and the defendant was TPM. Legal representation included I.R.B. Law LLP. The case was decided on 21 October 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 97?
[2025] SGFC 97 was delivered by Khoo May Ann in the Family Court on 21 October 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 97 cite?
[2025] SGFC 97 cites 7 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Family Justice Act, Supreme Court of Judicature Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (7)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 97)