TPL v TPM

Q: Which legislation does [2025] SGFC 97 consider?

The judgment refers to Family Justice Act and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2025] SGFC 97 Family Court 21 October 2025 D 2524/2014 · HCF/RAS 25/2025 28 min read

7 cases cited (6 SG, 1 foreign)

Outcome

Application dismissed

I dismissed the application in SUM 3101. SUM 340926. The Father referred to his application in SUM 3409 as his “Compliance Application”.

Source: [2025] SGFC 97, Family Court, decided 21 October 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	Family Court
Decided	21 October 2025
Judge	Khoo May Ann
Charges / claim	Family Law
Outcome	Application dismissed
Counsel	I.R.B. Law LLP, Kalvinder Kaur, Kulvinder Kaur

Source: [2025] SGFC 97, Family Court, decided 21 October 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law – Jurisdiction – Compliance with orders

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Khoo May Ann Delivered

Counsel (3)

I.R.B. Law LLP Firm Kalvinder Kaur Counsel Defendant Kulvinder Kaur Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

TPL Plaintiff TPM Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGFC 97 is a Family Court decision dated 21 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing jurisdiction. The judgment was delivered by Khoo May Ann. The case was brought by TPL (plaintiff) against TPM (defendant). Legal representation was provided by I.R.B. Law LLP. The judgment cites 7 cases (6 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Family Justice Act and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act.

[2025] SGFC 97 explained

TPL v TPM ([2025] SGFC 97) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 21 October 2025. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGFC 97 about?

TPL v TPM ([2025] SGFC 97) is a Family Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family Law – Jurisdiction – Compliance with orders”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2025] SGFC 97 consider?

The judgment refers to Family Justice Act and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

Summary

A post-divorce case where the father filed approximately 10 applications in response to the mother's application to vary property and child maintenance orders. The court dismissed the father's applications for an injunction restraining disclosure of documents and to compel further compliance with discovery orders, awarding costs of $3,000 to the mother.

What was decided in [2025] SGFC 97?

[2025] SGFC 97 (TPL v TPM) is a Family Court decision from 21 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically jurisdiction. The judgment was delivered by Khoo May Ann.

Who were the parties in TPL v TPM ([2025] SGFC 97)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGFC 97 was TPL, and the defendant was TPM. Legal representation included I.R.B. Law LLP. The case was decided on 21 October 2025 in the Family Court.