PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor
Outcome
Application allowedI allowed the application to proceed.
Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided 22 July 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Hoo Sheau Peng |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law |
| Outcome | Application allowed |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Withers KhattarWong LLP, Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam, Emily Koh, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Han Ming Kuang, Harjeet Kaur Dhaliwal, Johannes Hadi, June Ngian, Maria Santhosh, Tay Jia En |
Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 140 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 22 July 2025 concerning Criminal Law, specifically addressing offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (applicant) against DGH and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 15 cases (14 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 140 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor ([2025] SGHC 140) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 22 July 2025. It is categorised under Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 140 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor ([2025] SGHC 140) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Offences — Rape”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Sexual offences”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Outrage of modesty”, and “Criminal Law — Offences — Sexual assault by penetration”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 140 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 140 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 175. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 140?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 140 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Two accused persons, DGH and DGI, were tried for sexual offences including rape, sexual assault by penetration, and outrage of modesty committed against a female complainant in a hotel room, as well as related charges of obstructing justice and possessing intimate images. The court convicted both accused on all their respective charges, finding the complainant's testimony credible and rejecting the defence of consent.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 140?
[2025] SGHC 140 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 22 July 2025 addressing Criminal Law, specifically offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng.
Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor ([2025] SGHC 140)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 140 was Public Prosecutor, and the respondent was DGH, DGI. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 22 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 140?
[2025] SGHC 140 was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng in the High Court (General Division) on 22 July 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 140 cite?
[2025] SGHC 140 cites 15 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (15)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 140)