PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor

[2025] SGHC 140 High Court (General Division) 22 July 2025 HC/CC 45/2024
15 cases cited (14 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Convicted

“For all of the reasons above, I convict DGH and DGI of the charges they have respectively been charged with.”

Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided 22 July 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Hoo Sheau Peng
Charges / claim Criminal Law
Outcome Convicted
Counsel Attorney-General's Chambers, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Withers KhattarWong LLP, Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam, Emily Koh, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Han Ming Kuang, Harjeet Kaur Dhaliwal, Johannes Hadi, June Ngian, Maria Santhosh, Tay Jia En

Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (12)

Parties (3)

Public Prosecutor Applicant
DGH Defendant
DGI Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 140 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 22 July 2025 concerning Criminal Law, specifically addressing offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (applicant) against DGH and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 15 cases (14 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.

Summary

Two accused persons, DGH and DGI, were tried for sexual offences including rape, sexual assault by penetration, and outrage of modesty committed against a female complainant in a hotel room, as well as related charges of obstructing justice and possessing intimate images. The court convicted both accused on all their respective charges, finding the complainant's testimony credible and rejecting the defence of consent.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 140?

[2025] SGHC 140 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 22 July 2025 addressing Criminal Law, specifically offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng.

Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor ([2025] SGHC 140)?

The applicant in [2025] SGHC 140 was Public Prosecutor, and the respondent was DGH, DGI. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 22 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 140?

[2025] SGHC 140 was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng in the High Court (General Division) on 22 July 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 140 cite?

[2025] SGHC 140 cites 15 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (15)

SLR (10)
[1998] 3 SLR(R) 281 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 45 [2010] 2 SLR 15 [2012] 3 SLR 34 [2013] 1 SLR 1217 [2017] 2 SLR 1015 [2019] 1 SLR 829 [2019] 2 SLR 490 [2019] 3 SLR 749 [2020] 1 SLR 486
MY (1)
[1969] 2 MLJ 63

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 140)