PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor
Outcome
Convicted“For all of the reasons above, I convict DGH and DGI of the charges they have respectively been charged with.”
Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided 22 July 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Hoo Sheau Peng |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law |
| Outcome | Convicted |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Withers KhattarWong LLP, Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam, Emily Koh, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Han Ming Kuang, Harjeet Kaur Dhaliwal, Johannes Hadi, June Ngian, Maria Santhosh, Tay Jia En |
Source: [2025] SGHC 140, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 140 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 22 July 2025 concerning Criminal Law, specifically addressing offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (applicant) against DGH and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 15 cases (14 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
Summary
Two accused persons, DGH and DGI, were tried for sexual offences including rape, sexual assault by penetration, and outrage of modesty committed against a female complainant in a hotel room, as well as related charges of obstructing justice and possessing intimate images. The court convicted both accused on all their respective charges, finding the complainant's testimony credible and rejecting the defence of consent.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 140?
[2025] SGHC 140 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 22 July 2025 addressing Criminal Law, specifically offences. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng.
Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DGH & Anor ([2025] SGHC 140)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 140 was Public Prosecutor, and the respondent was DGH, DGI. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 22 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 140?
[2025] SGHC 140 was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng in the High Court (General Division) on 22 July 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 140 cite?
[2025] SGHC 140 cites 15 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (15)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 140)