LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v DOT SAFETY SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kwek Mean Luck |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | RHTLaw Asia LLP, Lim Muhammad Syafiq, Yap Wei Xuan Mendel |
Source: [2025] SGHC 214, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 214 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 30 October 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing parties. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck. The case was brought by Landscape Engineering Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Dot Safety Solutions Pte Ltd and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by RHTLaw Asia LLP. The judgment cites 8 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Supreme Court of Judicature Act.
[2025] SGHC 214 explained
LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v DOT SAFETY SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 214) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 30 October 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 214 about?
LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v DOT SAFETY SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 214) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Parties — Self-representation of company”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 214 consider?
The judgment refers to Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 214 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHCR 33. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 214?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 214 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A sole director and shareholder of a company applied for permission to represent the company as a lay person in proceedings brought against both him and the company. The court allowed the application under O 4 r 3(3)(b) of the Rules of Court 2021, interpreting the provision as having two disjunctive elements — executive/administrative capacity and being a proper person — and finding that allowing lay representation would not extend the time or costs of proceedings since the director was already self-represented.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 214?
[2025] SGHC 214 (LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v DOT SAFETY SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 30 October 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically parties. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck.
Who were the parties in LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v DOT SAFETY SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2025] SGHC 214)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 214 was Landscape Engineering Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Dot Safety Solutions Pte Ltd, Kumarandy Alaguraj. Legal representation included RHTLaw Asia LLP. The case was decided on 30 October 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 214?
[2025] SGHC 214 was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck in the High Court (General Division) on 30 October 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 214 cite?
[2025] SGHC 214 cites 8 prior decisions. It references Supreme Court of Judicature Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (8)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 214)