PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Hoo Sheau Peng |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Chia S Arul LLC, Nicole Teo, Tan Jun Hao, Don (Chen Junhao), Tay Jia En, Teai Shoon Jiat |
Source: [2025] SGHC 260, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 260 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 23 December 2025 concerning Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically addressing offences and sentencing. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (plaintiff) against Gao Xiong (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Chia S Arul LLC. The judgment cites 5 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Penal Code, and the Protection from Harassment Act.
[2025] SGHC 260 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong ([2025] SGHC 260) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 23 December 2025. It is categorised under Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 260 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong ([2025] SGHC 260) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Offences — Attempted rape”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Property — Criminal trespass”, and “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Principles”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 260 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Penal Code (Cap 224), and Protection from Harassment Act (Cap 256A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A Chinese PhD student pleaded guilty to attempted rape of a female ex-flatmate and three charges of criminal trespass, having entered her condominium unit uninvited on three occasions. The court sentenced him to six years and six months' imprisonment with three strokes of the cane for the attempted rape and consecutive sentences for the most serious criminal trespass charge, for a global sentence of six years, six months and six weeks' imprisonment.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 260?
[2025] SGHC 260 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 23 December 2025 addressing Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically offences and sentencing. The judgment was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng.
Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong ([2025] SGHC 260)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 260 was Public Prosecutor, and the defendant was Gao Xiong. Legal representation included Chia S Arul LLC and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 23 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 260?
[2025] SGHC 260 was delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng in the High Court (General Division) on 23 December 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 260 cite?
[2025] SGHC 260 cites 5 prior decisions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code, Protection from Harassment Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Sentencing outcomes for this offence
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 260)