PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lee Heng Wong
Outcome
Sentence imposedI sentenced the accused to 16 years’ imprisonment, backdated to the date of his arrest.
Source: [2025] SGHC 3, High Court (General Division), decided 9 January 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Valerie Thean |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Outcome | Sentence imposed |
| Sentence / award | 16 years’ imprisonment |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Invictus Law Corporation, Brian Tan, Cory Wong Gao Yean, Siew Wei Ying Silas, Tan Joon Liang Josephus, Timotheus Koh |
Source: [2025] SGHC 3, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 3 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 9 January 2025 concerning Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically addressing sentencing. The judgment was delivered by Valerie Thean. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (plaintiff) against Lee Heng Wong (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Invictus Law Corporation. The judgment cites 13 cases and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code.
[2025] SGHC 3 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lee Heng Wong ([2025] SGHC 3) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 9 January 2025. It is categorised under Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 3 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lee Heng Wong ([2025] SGHC 3) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Sentencing – Aggravating factors – Abscondment” and “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Sentencing – Aggravating factors – Premeditation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 3 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
The accused, a nightclub bouncer, pleaded guilty to culpable homicide not amounting to murder for stabbing an intoxicated patron twice in the left thigh with a knife at a Geylang disco in 2010, causing fatal blood loss. The court sentenced him to 16 years' imprisonment, taking into account that he had absconded to Malaysia for over 12 years before turning himself in, the premeditation in retrieving the knife, and the victim's defenceless state.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 3?
[2025] SGHC 3 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lee Heng Wong) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 9 January 2025 addressing Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically sentencing. The judgment was delivered by Valerie Thean.
Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lee Heng Wong ([2025] SGHC 3)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 3 was Public Prosecutor, and the defendant was Lee Heng Wong. Legal representation included Invictus Law Corporation and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 9 January 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 3?
[2025] SGHC 3 was delivered by Valerie Thean in the High Court (General Division) on 9 January 2025. The case concerned Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 3 cite?
[2025] SGHC 3 cites 13 prior decisions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (13)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 3)