Zhang Jinxia & Anor v Zhu Yuhua
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part“In the result, we allow the appeal in part, only to the extent of correcting the calculation error, and reducing the interest due under the Second IOU loan by S$2,000 such that amount owed by the Appellants under the Second IOU loan is S$224,000 and not S$226,000.”
Source: [2026] SGHC(A) 3, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 26 January 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Appellate Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Ang Cheng Hock, Debbie Ong Siew Ling, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Damages, Credit and Security |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed in part |
| Sentence / award | $2,000 |
| Counsel | De Souza Lim & Goh LLP, Invictus Law Corporation, Wilberforce TJC Law Corporation, Darren Tan Tho Eng, Goh Kim Thong Andrew, Nathanael Carmello Lopez, Siew Wei Ying Silas, Sim Qian Hui, Teo Sze-Yin Emily |
Source: [2026] SGHC(A) 3, High Court (Appellate Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (9)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC(A) 3 is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision dated 26 January 2026 concerning Credit and Security and Damages, specifically addressing liquidated damages or penalty and money and moneylenders. The judgment was delivered by Ang Cheng Hock, with Debbie Ong Siew Ling and Woo Bih Li on the coram. The case was brought by Wang Quancheng and others (appellant) against Zhu Yuhua (respondent). Legal representation was provided by De Souza Lim & Goh LLP and Invictus Law Corporation. The judgment cites 5 cases (4 Singapore, 1 foreign).
Summary
The appellants appealed against a judgment requiring them to repay loans under two written agreements, challenging the calculation of overpayment on the first loan and the enforceability of an interest clause in the second loan as a penalty. The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part, correcting a calculation error and reducing interest by $2,000, but rejected the penalty argument finding the agreed interest clause was not extravagant or unconscionable given the parties' equal bargaining power.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC(A) 3?
[2026] SGHC(A) 3 (Zhang Jinxia & Anor v Zhu Yuhua) is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision from 26 January 2026 addressing Credit and Security and Damages, specifically liquidated damages or penalty and money and moneylenders. The judgment was delivered by Ang Cheng Hock.
Who were the parties in Zhang Jinxia & Anor v Zhu Yuhua ([2026] SGHC(A) 3)?
The appellant in [2026] SGHC(A) 3 was Wang Quancheng, Zhang Jinxia, and the respondent was Zhu Yuhua. Legal representation included Invictus Law Corporation and De Souza Lim & Goh LLP. The case was decided on 26 January 2026 in the High Court (Appellate Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC(A) 3?
[2026] SGHC(A) 3 was delivered by Ang Cheng Hock in the High Court (Appellate Division) on 26 January 2026. Debbie Ong Siew Ling and Woo Bih Li also sat on the coram. The case concerned Credit and Security and Damages.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC(A) 3 cite?
[2026] SGHC(A) 3 cites 5 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC(A) 3)