Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffjudgment is granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for a total sum of $41,250 in general and aggravated damages.
Source: [2025] SGHC 54, High Court (General Division), decided 28 March 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | S Mohan |
| Charges / claim | Tort |
| Outcome | Judgment for the plaintiff |
| Sentence / award | $41,250 |
| Counsel | A C Fergusson Law Corporation, Dodwell & Co LLC, Alfred Dodwell, Tan Yu Poh Susan, Tan-Goh Song Gek Alice |
Source: [2025] SGHC 54, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 54 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 March 2025 concerning Tort, specifically addressing defamation. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan. The case was brought by Diana Foo (plaintiff) against Woo Mui Chan (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Dodwell & Co LLC and A C Fergusson Law Corporation. The judgment cites 52 cases (36 Singapore, 16 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Defamation Act and the Oaths and Declarations Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 54 explained
Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan ([2025] SGHC 54) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 28 March 2025. It is categorised under Tort. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 54 about?
Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan ([2025] SGHC 54) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Tort — Defamation — Damages — Assessment of damages” and “Tort — Defamation — Damages — Whether loss of earnings, business and clientele falls under general damages or special damages”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 54 consider?
The judgment refers to Defamation Act and Oaths and Declarations Act (Cap 211). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 54 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 11 and [2024] SGHC 81. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 54?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 54 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Following a finding of liability for two defamatory statements — one posted on Facebook about a beauty salon owner and another to the salon's landlord — the court assessed damages at $41,250 in total. The award comprised $25,000 general damages and $6,250 aggravated damages for the first statement and $8,000 general damages and $2,000 aggravated damages for the second, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for $350,000 as largely based on bare assertions.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 54?
[2025] SGHC 54 (Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 March 2025 addressing Tort, specifically defamation. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan.
Who were the parties in Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan ([2025] SGHC 54)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 54 was Diana Foo, and the defendant was Woo Mui Chan. Legal representation included A C Fergusson Law Corporation and Dodwell & Co LLC. The case was decided on 28 March 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 54?
[2025] SGHC 54 was delivered by S Mohan in the High Court (General Division) on 28 March 2025. The case concerned Tort.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 54 cite?
[2025] SGHC 54 cites 52 prior decisions, including 16 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Defamation Act, Oaths and Declarations Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (52)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 54)